Mikey_D
Newcomer
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2012
- Sythe Gold
- 0
- Messages
- 15
If there is already a thread on this topic, feel free to delete. I do not see one so I am going to start a discussion on it.
The events of 9/11 are a bit puzzling. I honestly can say I do not know what to believe. There are just too many facts on each side.
I have watched the documentary 9/11: Loose Change. That really opened my eye to the conspiracy idea. There is a lot of evidence supporting it, along with many inconsistencies in the United States version of events.
One thing I really can't understand is all the military testing they had scheduled for that day. I believe the project was called Global Guardian where they had jets scrambled out of the United States, from many air force bases around the country.
Also the way American flight 77 hit the pentagon. If the terrorists wanted to inflict maximum damage, why didn't they go nose down into the building instead of that tough decent to where the plane is very close to the ground. Experienced pilots even say that this is near impossible. A Boeing 757 is 45 feet long, 55 feet high, has a 124 foot wing span and weighs almost 100 tons. Take a look at the hole that the plane left into the pentagon after the impact. There is no damage from where the wings should have left some. Your telling me that that huge aircraft made that tiny hole, and no traces of major parts of the plane could be recovered?
Thermite has the potential to melt steel , not jet fuel. And there were significant amounts of it found in the debris of the buildings after they had collapsed. Note that the buildings also fell "demolition style". Only one thing can make that happen, and that is explosives.
I do think that the towers were actually hit by planes and that hijackers actually took over the planes. I just think they could have been mules for a much larger scheme.
About WTC7, saying that it was burned down from falling debris and fires. Well.... I am not so sure. WTC7 was close to the twin towers, but there were many other buildings even closer. None of those had fallen demolition style like WTC7 and the twin towers did. Also, WTC7 had important documents in that building. I believe there was also a couple eye witness accounts of them reporting, while in the building, hearing explosives go off and the floor underneath them collapsing. Now, I don't believe in everything I hear so their accounts alone don't influence my opinion on the whole dilemma. It is just sketchy.
There are many more points that I could put out there, I will add more to this post little by little. I want to hear what you guys have to say. I am no 9/11 expert but I do know alot of information about the day. What is your opinion on the situation? Have you watched loose change? State here with arguments that are constructive.
The events of 9/11 are a bit puzzling. I honestly can say I do not know what to believe. There are just too many facts on each side.
I have watched the documentary 9/11: Loose Change. That really opened my eye to the conspiracy idea. There is a lot of evidence supporting it, along with many inconsistencies in the United States version of events.
One thing I really can't understand is all the military testing they had scheduled for that day. I believe the project was called Global Guardian where they had jets scrambled out of the United States, from many air force bases around the country.
Also the way American flight 77 hit the pentagon. If the terrorists wanted to inflict maximum damage, why didn't they go nose down into the building instead of that tough decent to where the plane is very close to the ground. Experienced pilots even say that this is near impossible. A Boeing 757 is 45 feet long, 55 feet high, has a 124 foot wing span and weighs almost 100 tons. Take a look at the hole that the plane left into the pentagon after the impact. There is no damage from where the wings should have left some. Your telling me that that huge aircraft made that tiny hole, and no traces of major parts of the plane could be recovered?
Thermite has the potential to melt steel , not jet fuel. And there were significant amounts of it found in the debris of the buildings after they had collapsed. Note that the buildings also fell "demolition style". Only one thing can make that happen, and that is explosives.
I do think that the towers were actually hit by planes and that hijackers actually took over the planes. I just think they could have been mules for a much larger scheme.
About WTC7, saying that it was burned down from falling debris and fires. Well.... I am not so sure. WTC7 was close to the twin towers, but there were many other buildings even closer. None of those had fallen demolition style like WTC7 and the twin towers did. Also, WTC7 had important documents in that building. I believe there was also a couple eye witness accounts of them reporting, while in the building, hearing explosives go off and the floor underneath them collapsing. Now, I don't believe in everything I hear so their accounts alone don't influence my opinion on the whole dilemma. It is just sketchy.
There are many more points that I could put out there, I will add more to this post little by little. I want to hear what you guys have to say. I am no 9/11 expert but I do know alot of information about the day. What is your opinion on the situation? Have you watched loose change? State here with arguments that are constructive.
