I don't agree. My reason is one word, and one word only.
MURDER.
MURDER.
Shadow Lord said:I don't agree. My reason is one word, and one word only.
MURDER.
Why does the fetus get rights?
My blood type is A positive, and so is my mother's. My father's is O.
If abortion is murder, why do you condone it under some circumstances?
I do not support this unless the mother is too young to manager her life and the life of another. A 16 Year old girl can't go to school and take care of a baby.
I think it is wrong if the woman is finished school and has time to look after herself and the baby.
What i am saying is that since the mother carries the baby, it has more say, and should.
silab king said:i think its wrong if your old enuth to get pregnant your old enuth to bring it up
xestrox said:if you read i clearly stated i do not support it under any circumstances,
i think its wrong if your old enuth to get pregnant your old enuth to bring it up
On the contrary, me and many others support abortion simply because we hate kids.Thing is, people don't just have abortions for fun. There's ought to be a reason why the baby can't be raised in a stable enough environment.
Maybe the baby is surely going to die at birth? Abortion would be the right thing then, I believe, to decrease suffering.
I agree that people should be able to make their own choices. People who have abortions aren't doing it to be cruel, they are doing it because they believe it is the best thing to do within the circumstances.
MatthewGor123 said:I personally am 100% pro-choice. While I sometimes disagree with the decision (such as if the person was like screwing everybody not caring about the possible effects) and feel like the MOTHER deserves some form of punishment, why punish a baby by giving it a horrible life? Getting an abortion has been proven to increase stress and emotional instability dramatically. However, is it fair to force a rape-victim or someone who gets unlucky with a broken condom to have to give birth to a child and then either raise it or give it a way? I really don't think so.
MatthewGor123 said:A human gains the right to life when it can rationally think
To clarify, this means that humans first begin to get rights at round two or three years of age, correct?
MatthewGor123 said:Come on dude, you know what I meant. Obviously, not think reasonably - I meant like feel and sense emotion. Sorry, it's like 1:00 AM here. I'm no anatomy expert or anything, but I know that fetuses in the early stages do NOT feel pain or emotion, but newborn babies do.
MatthewGor123 said:Don't think I'm trying to change the subject, because I'm quite enjoying this - but what end of the spectrum do YOU personally fall? I've seen you take both sides of the spectrum - or are you just playing devils advocate?
MatthewGor123 said:Seriously though, the ability to feel emotions determines the right to live. It's not like the baby has a DESIRE to live until it is born - or anyways, until it has FEELINGS...this is a really, really stupid analogy so PLEASE make fun of me as much as you can for it, but should it be illegal to like, oh I don't know, bite your fingernails because you are killing living matter? And should it be illegal to kill animals? [oh shit why did I bring that up...]
Fetuses in the fairly early-middle stages and later can feel pain. Do they have a right to life?
Also, why does the ability to feel pain confer a right to life?
The Fat Controller said:http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/294/8/947 - According to this study at least, we're talking pretty far in for fetal pain. There's a lot of controversy about this issue though.
Response to external stimuli or interaction with the environment is arguably one of the factors that make a human a person, thus the question of pain is important.

