I already explained everything.
It is the same as Bus/Divine, PieGP has/doesn't take part in the spam forum (they haven't in over 6 months) - so anything said about them isn't allowed in the spam forum also at the time of closing the thread you had tags saying "PieGP is a scammer" and the title also had scammer which isn't allowed.
It looks like those threads are completely untouched/not edited. The only threads I've edited are the false positives (e.g claiming he scammed and then being proven wrong.)
You still aren't allowed to make a thread saying they are scammers.
Just for reference, how come?
How is calling a scammer who scammed (in this case piegp, in instances in the past it was bus with his DNT or forum bans) in the spam forum anything but factual when the event clearly happened in the past? I don't understand how users keep getting information posted about them wiped from the spam forum even though this rule exists and people are simply mentioning what happened regardless of spam forum involvement.
- Any vicious attacks aimed at anyone not willingly partaking in the Spam Forum. This excludes factual/evidence discussion. Staff will decide what duration constitutes a full leave of absence from the spam forum. (If the member is/has been particularly active this may be as long as 3 months.)
Last edited:



















































































