F
Folt ban appeal
Guest
Hey guys. Just a couple of things I wanted to bring light to.
1. There was no intention in ruining a marketed transaction when this name was legitimately taken.
- The name was taken during the name release phase, there was ALOT of movement going on with names being changed, wiped and released my Jagex, transferring around accounts. As someone who actively participates in the names market I was apt to dedicating my time in building up levels of stock to sell and taking advantage of this great opportunity.
2. I can admit that I had used some automated methods to learn about which names were being released during the name release, however:
- Doing this was not structured to harm other users, and was done without taking (sniping) from others as I was primarily focused only on names which were being released on their respective days and nothing else.
3. After being pardoned on here, I've restructured my goals in the names market.
- Since I've been pardonned in April, I've tied the knot and haven't been involving myself in this sort of behavior at all. I've been selling off old stock that I've collected through the years with the goal in mind to eventually resign from the names market once they are all gone.
- I've put alot of mental energy into restructuring my routine and focusing a lot less on name sales over the past few months since I've been pardoned. I've been trying to think of a different route to take as I have been getting sick and tired with this. It isn't easy as this has played a big part of my life now for almost a decade.
4. When a username becomes available, it's free-game for anyone to take.
- Just because I've taken a username that's become available does not mean it's been "sniped". For example, if the username "Hummus" became available this morning, for whatever reason, why should I be penalized for taking that if there was some unknown dispute regarding that name previous months in the past?
Furthermore, I messaged the user who created the report against me who was victimized in March and let him know that I'd have been happy to return his lost name to him and told him I would have given it back right away if he was up front with me from the start. I'm not annoyed or angry with his decision to report me nor would I hold a grudge toward him for him making it either. I will gladly return the disputed name at hand, as the bad intentions weren't there from the start when taking the name when it was available, and this will be returned whether I get unbanned from here or not.
Moderators please let me know if anything else can be done in aid to remedy the situation or if I should remain banned.
1. There was no intention in ruining a marketed transaction when this name was legitimately taken.
- The name was taken during the name release phase, there was ALOT of movement going on with names being changed, wiped and released my Jagex, transferring around accounts. As someone who actively participates in the names market I was apt to dedicating my time in building up levels of stock to sell and taking advantage of this great opportunity.
2. I can admit that I had used some automated methods to learn about which names were being released during the name release, however:
- Doing this was not structured to harm other users, and was done without taking (sniping) from others as I was primarily focused only on names which were being released on their respective days and nothing else.
3. After being pardoned on here, I've restructured my goals in the names market.
- Since I've been pardonned in April, I've tied the knot and haven't been involving myself in this sort of behavior at all. I've been selling off old stock that I've collected through the years with the goal in mind to eventually resign from the names market once they are all gone.
- I've put alot of mental energy into restructuring my routine and focusing a lot less on name sales over the past few months since I've been pardoned. I've been trying to think of a different route to take as I have been getting sick and tired with this. It isn't easy as this has played a big part of my life now for almost a decade.
4. When a username becomes available, it's free-game for anyone to take.
- Just because I've taken a username that's become available does not mean it's been "sniped". For example, if the username "Hummus" became available this morning, for whatever reason, why should I be penalized for taking that if there was some unknown dispute regarding that name previous months in the past?
Furthermore, I messaged the user who created the report against me who was victimized in March and let him know that I'd have been happy to return his lost name to him and told him I would have given it back right away if he was up front with me from the start. I'm not annoyed or angry with his decision to report me nor would I hold a grudge toward him for him making it either. I will gladly return the disputed name at hand, as the bad intentions weren't there from the start when taking the name when it was available, and this will be returned whether I get unbanned from here or not.
Moderators please let me know if anything else can be done in aid to remedy the situation or if I should remain banned.
