Sandy Hook

[FloydZeppelin]

Except, you're still wrong. Because there is never evidence put forth, just circumstantial bullshit, things taken out of context and just questions thrown out to confuse the viewer.

Shit like this is just as bad as the media, he wants things like this to be a hoax, and tries to convince others of that. He's not trying to find answers, he's fabricating them.

Fuck dude, I think I just posted in sfa somewhere about the hoax surrounding Kurt Cobain back when he supposedly blew his brains out. A lot of stuff regarding that is more than circumstantial in my opinion, and tbh enough to put some away for life/no parole, but nothing has been answered/done about that for almost 20 years now, and now it's nothing but a "Dumb conspiracy" and no one cares cuz 'he's just a depressed psycho'.

That's just one example of a conspiracy that has a PLETHORA of evidence behind it, and no attention to be messed with. And the same goes for a lot of these other "stupid conspiracies", and they will only continue to pile up as unaddressed situations.

I'll say one last time, forget the Sandy Hook shit, all of that aside; do you honestly believe that all conspiracies are fake with no circumstantial evidence?

And, didn't you just post somewhere you supported the jfk/rfk conspiracy?

 

[mage3158]

I'll say one last time, forget the Sandy Hook shit, all of that aside; do you honestly believe that all conspiracies are fake with no circumstantial evidence?

Taking things out of context to support your own argument? NICE.

No, I have absolutely nothing against conspiracies, and have done a plethora of research myself into various different cases (9/11, RFK, JFK, etc...) and all have their interesting and suspicious points.
What -I- have an issue with is people like the author of the video who almost CREATES evidence, and makes vague statements to convince people of this dribble (Emile not actually dead, are you fucking kidding me?). It's not logical, and it sure as hell isn't helping anything.

I agree some cases do not see enough attention, but that has very little to do with what this man is doing.

 

[FloydZeppelin]

Taking things out of context to support your own argument? NICE.

No, I have absolutely nothing against conspiracies, and have done a plethora of research myself into various different cases (9/11, RFK, JFK, etc...) and all have their interesting and suspicious points.
What -I- have an issue with is people like the author of the video who almost CREATES evidence, and makes vague statements to convince people of this dribble (Emile not actually dead, are you fucking kidding me?). It's not logical, and it sure as hell isn't helping anything.

I agree some cases do not see enough attention, but that has very little to do with what this man is doing.

First point: I must have misunderstood what you said, I'm not trying to pick a fight with you or make some sort of fool out of you... and I'm glad you do your own research, because a lot of people really will just buy what a YT video says, you're right about that.

And the only reason I said forget the Sandy Hook shit, is because I agree with you. Like I said before, most of this is hype from the last conspiracy from a 6 months back... I think a lot of the "Evidence" is bs, and I would never have the guts to seriously claim that no one died that day because I guess I just don't believe it enough (Being this theory).

Just to clear that up

 

[Alex k]

Sorry can someone please explain to me what's happening. I'm completely lost
Thanks c: x

 

[I get specs]

When I heard about the Shooting, im not going to lie. I cried.

 

[Tha Infamous E]

View my thread about this event, my video is much more valuable, <3.

 

[mage3158]

I like how he removed the video after being shot down incredibly hard.