I love them, i could write books on them.
I think sandy hook was set up so the government had a reason to start their gun control shit. One of the "mom's" was the same "mother" in another school shooting and in the live feed from the helicopter above there was a man running into the woods after the shooting, which was never talked about again. One of the guns used to kill the kids was in the "shooter's" trunk. During a news interview the "father" of a kid that died was laughing until he saw a camera on him then he instantly stopped and started crying.
Some guy bought the twin towers and took out insurance like a couple months before the attack and in the pictures of whats left the cuts of the foundation were straight edged cuts, something that would happen if it had dynamite wrapped around it. All clean cuts around the metal support rods.
Are you just going to speculate or are you actually going to cite your evidence, where it came from, how potentially valid AND invalid it may be, as well as explore other possibilities?
When you want to see something or are predisposed to see something, you will see it. Try looking at things through an objective eye and be sceptical about these things; you'll most likely see it a lot differently.
Edit: let's examine this.
Man runs in to woods, was never discussed -> Government did it.
Man transitioned from laughing to crying -> Government did it.
Gun was in man's trunk -> Government did it.
Man allegedly takes insurance on twin towers -> towers collapse -> Government did it
Allegedly cuts in tower foundations, which are not verifiable, are supposed to be clean cuts -> Government did it.
---
It sounds pretty ridiculous. Forgive me if I don't follow your reasoning (not that there was any reasoning anyway)






















