Your body stores energy for later.
My point is that the author made a jump from a wavefunction collapse to an immortal soul, without showing how the former proves the latter.
You're misunderstanding my point - if a scientist has an idea, but has no supporting evidence, it's a hypothesis. That doesn't mean that science supports your point until there's evidence.
This doesn't make any sense. Can you elaborate?
You have linked articles, misleading translations of the Quran, and...that's about it.
I KNOW how to make bronze, but I don't currently have the ABILITY to do so. If I taught you how to make bronze, but didn't provide you any materials, could you make it from nothing?
False dichotomy, it's neither.
Sure, and there have been many corrupt religious leaders, but that doesn't prove all of religion wrong, now does it?
Yeah, that's really a matter of opinion.
This is a debate forum, nobody's forcing anybody to do anything.
Nobody said anything about life - all I said was that a planet doesn't need mountains.
You didn't actually ask a question.
I didn't say anything about "needing" stability.
I originally said that the universe was not perfectly harmonized, you responded:
It has to otherwise it will collapse, if one side is over proportioned if it expands to much, and is to heavy on one side it will fall. It's simple mathematics.
First of all, that doesn't even address my point, second, the universe can't "fall" into anything.
...That IS the definition. That's what dictionaries do, they define things.
Okay. How do you think people survive with artificial hearts?
If it stays with the rest of the hot lava, it stays molten. If it erupts into the air, it cools off and becomes stone.
Neat perspective, but you didn't answer the question of this thread.
Sure, I'd be interested.
In your first sentence you speak of evidence to support your claims and in your third you imply that evidence isn't required to make a truth claim. To quote Sam Harris: "one is either engaged in an honest appraisal of the evidence and logical arguments, or one isn't."To reply I have provided, sufficient evidence to support my claims. Everything you suggested was proven wrong by common sense.
I forgot though science doesn't agree with something that cant be seen in the life, it's kind of like how it can't figure out how the brain functions.
Good try, everything I say is speculation and there is no point in arguing a losing battle, when clearly the culprits are all blind.
exactly my boys we yes belive in godofcource believe on god!
In your first sentence you speak of evidence to support your claims and in your third you imply that evidence isn't required to make a truth claim. To quote Sam Harris: "one is either engaged in an honest appraisal of the evidence and logical arguments, or one isn't."
I literally did quote you lolPlease quote me as saying that, as I never said that. The evidence I have provided is sufficient, no where did I say without evidence can you make a truthful claim.
I said multiple times if you can prove me wrong go ahead. Use the same logic that you have quoted on your self.
I literally did quote you lol
To reply I have provided, sufficient evidence to support my claims. Everything you suggested was proven wrong by common sense.
I forgot though science doesn't agree with something that cant be seen in the life, it's kind of like how it can't figure out how the brain functions.
Good try, everything I say is speculation and there is no point in arguing a losing battle, when clearly the culprits are all blind.
I disagree. I provided a rebuttal to everything you stated.
Ah come on man, we have a fairly good idea of how the brain works. That's why we're able to read MRIs and perform brain surgery. It's comments like this that make it look like you're trolling.
Anytime that you want to continue the discussion, I'll be around. ربنا يحميك (I'm sorry if I messed that up), I know we disagree but regardless, best wishes, and I hope all's well with you.![]()
No, but this doesn't r mean that there is nothing after the death
Perhaps a new life?
If you mean Jesus, then no. But I trust that, there is someone, that who control all over the whole universe. Maybe we can name it god.
One has to exist for things to exist. That's my pov, whether that mean that we are all part of this "god form" idk.
If you live by that logic, then.. Who created God?
That's sorta the whole 'Chicken or the egg' thing.. messes with my head too much xD

