Reporting Shin for stealing $500 from dead cancer victim

-Jon & I were awarded $500 in restitution for the DDoS attacks iZinc (BigBoiBets) made against our poker server back in 2013: https://i.imgur.com/2EwQ2Le.png Disputing an account ban https://i.imgur.com/R4EmBAT.png [bigboibets] requesting pardon for [listed]

-Shin was a former employee and scam victim of iZinc, and he received a partial restitution from iZinc's pardon back in 2014: https://i.imgur.com/iWwOvYR.png https://i.imgur.com/UV2mZ2Z.png and is fully aware of the DDoS attacks: https://i.imgur.com/8EuRAE1.png

-iZinc contacted me on October 18th and offered to repay $500 restitution. I gave him my BTC address and no further comment: https://i.imgur.com/1N8xxuS.png

-iZinc responded on October 19th and requested an invoice. I posted this thread for him (previously in the spam forum, since moved) to confirm on Sythe with the Skype confirmation and BTC address confirmation: iZinc/Bigboibets DDoS attack invoice

-iZinc posts a thread on December 10th in the dispute section (instead of the pardon section) and doesn't tag me in it: Fully resolving our dispute saying that he hasn't been able to contact me on skype (he didn't try to contact me on Skype, and provided no evidence of this) and he can't pay me the $500 because the title of the previous invoice didn't have "adequate wording"

-Charlotte tags me and I respond, saying iZinc is lying and did not attempt to contact me, and already has the BTC address. I go to link the BTC invoice thread I made in October, but I see it has been deleted by a staff member.

-I post on December 11th, asking what happened to the original invoice thread: Fully resolving our dispute

No response

-I post a week later, December 19th, trying to find out why staff members were deleting the BTC address of pardon victims: Fully resolving our dispute

No response

-Finally, December 29th, Shin posts saying this:

I responded, asking him to provide evidence for his accusations.

Instead of responding with evidence of slander and standing aside to let another administrator oversee the case, Shin (or someone at his request) took the $500 restitution for himself according to this post: Fully resolving our dispute

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

And what reason did he give for taking the money himself? He said I don't have a sufficient invoice.

Given that Shin used his staff powers to delete my invoice thread for "slander" and refuses to provide evidence for his accusations, since Shin's reason for accepting the money is that "I don't have a sufficient invoice", I say this is a scam.

Final thoughts:

 

@video I'm tagging you here because I don't think you will let @Shin rob Jon's grave. @Charlotte I'm tagging you here because you PMed me saying "Let me know if I need to step in". @Sythe I'm tagging you here because a staff member has the BTC address of a pardon victim and used his position of power to accept the coins himself.

 

Okay.

Were you trying to make a point?

You responded after 11 hours and it seems like he responded the very next day.

Nice. He responded and you left out time stamps this time. Oh, you also left out requests made by iZinC regarding the invoice. Not that any of that matters though. You clearly weren't serious about it then and still aren't serious about it now.

Well, if you knew how XenForo works you'd know that tagging you in any post by a non-staff member in the dispute forum won't alert you because threads are moderated in those sections. Also, you're claiming that iZinC made zero contact with you since requesting an invoice on October 19th? I'd love to see the proof of that, but it'd only waste more time, which you're a bad excuse for.

Yep. It was. I wouldn't be surprised if you had that thread on auto-refresh every 5 minutes since the second you originally posted it.

Okay.

I like how much you waste time trying to focus on unimportant points. As I've told you almost a dozen times now, the thread was deleted because it was posted in the spam forum and violated the rules. iZinC/Andreas wanted the thread removed/deleted because they were claiming the invoice was "slanderous" and I could see their point based on the section you posted it. You weren't serious about it as I said before. I even spent a month before deleting the thread, which honestly was a month longer than it should have been. You've been instructed what you need to do in a respectful way ever since I had to get involved with your shit again, but I didn't expect for a moment you had your head unstuck from your ass yet.

I didn't take the money for myself and I'm about to be done with you slandering me. Richard is and has always been holding the money in escrow.

Well, you couldn't possibly be more wrong. You're "scamming" yourself.

With a thread like this especially given the title, I can provide quite the negative character reference for you right now and let me tell you... it is much worse than anything you've claimed BigBoiBets or anyone else to be. The fact you would try to use someone's name in vain who passed away from cancer that you called "friend", in addition to so many members of the community, in a way like this? I sincerely recommend you seek out either a counselor or mental institution.

Do NOT post unless you have information on a report [YOU WILL BE INFRACTED OR TEMPORARILY BANNED]

 

Yes. Since iZinc must have told you all about all of his blackhat attacks, there's no way you could interpret an invoice for restitution for the blackhat attacks he committed as "slanderous".

Here are the accusations you fabricated that took 18 days for you to respond with as reasoning for deleting the restitution thread, while fully aware of the scope of the blackhat attacks committed by iZinc against his competitors:

Time stamps are on the original invoice. Don't pretend like I'm trying to obfuscate them here on the report.

The thread has been in dispute forum archives since Jan 1st. You directed Richard to escrow the money ~7-9 days later. Saying you escrowed the money because the thread was posted in the wrong section is a fraudulent reason.

You didn't have to get involved in my shit at all, because iZinc was supposed to contact @Charlotte to facilitate repayment. He didn't attempt to do so.

I'd actually prefer if you fucked off entirely, which is why I asked another admin to oversee the case. Why didn't you do that, given that @video already handled it?

Why did you crop me addressing this specifically off of your response to my quote and put a bunch of bullshit in between? Stop trying to feign butthurt and waste everyone's time.

The end recipient doesn't matter, the issue is that you redirected the collection of the money in the first place.

I'm not using Jon's name in vain, I mean the title very literally. I am accusing you of colluding with one of this site's most decorated scammers/blackhat offenders, your former employer, to redirect money away from his victims, who were HIS former employers. The fact one of them is in the grave and isn't here to defend himself personally apparently doesn't affect your conscience, which is honestly sickening.


---

I'm done talking with Shin, he has no evidence of his accusations to provide and only more insults because according to him, I'm "not serious" about getting repaid.

I ask other staff members: is there any way to construe this post as 'slanderous' (containing falsehoods), or any excuse to collect (or continue to hold) the coins since it has been in dispute archives since Jan 1st, 9 days before Shin directed the collection of the money?

The invoice contains
-The amount being repaid
-The BTC address to pay
-The screencap of the skype conversation
-The reason the restitution is being paid

How is this not sufficient?

 

There's already been instances of regular users not being a part of this posting on this thread.

I remind you all to read: Do NOT post unless you have information on a report [YOU WILL BE INFRACTED OR TEMPORARILY BANNED]

And I'll be giving out 3 day bans if this keeps happening.

 

The funds will need to be paid to a new BTC address, the other address deposits to an exchange that is experiencing issues, and no longer safe to send to.

New address:

368kX71gvtnxdzEdKRueLjczZPw92JaBaE

 

Assumptions? Also, blackhat activities and your meme invoice are separated in this context. I can see you trying to pull strings though.

Accusations? Fabrication? Lol.

It didn't take me long to write up a response and I'm not sorry for being busy. How long has it taken for you to post a proper invoice? Oh, right... you're not interested in that and want to slander/accuse me of things instead.

I wasn't pretending and your response is completely political. How funny.

Yes. You threw a temper tantrum to another Administrator and got them to break the staff code because you're so interested in being right. We've already discussed this and moved on. I requested Richard's assistance to escrow the money the moment you failed to post in the window of time I kindly provided. It was posted in the wrong section. I made a request. You tried to go around it. That didn't work and it still won't work. You can try all you want.

Perhaps he was waiting on you to post a proper invoice. Who knows.

If you're trying to claim @video "already handled it", then why did you post this thread 10 days later? If his response was sufficient, then you didn't even respect your own request for his involvement.

Since you seem to be slightly stupid, what that means is my request for you to post a new invoice was completely reasonable, my actions were not corrupt, and I was ensuring both you and iZinC are shown the same respect in handling the compensation.

I don't know what you're on about, but you seem to have dangerous salt levels at the moment. I'd appreciate it if you stopped wasting everyone's time again as well.

You acknowledged my request and failed to comply in the timeframe provided. Therefore, the money was escrowed, awaiting a very quick and simple post from you.

You are and if that's the excuse you're making in an attempt to rationalize it being okay, then you're much sicker than I imagined.

Please post the invoice where requested when available. Any future reports/threads you try to make regarding this situation will be met with an infraction.

Thank you.

 

You're posting again in the wrong place, it's not an invoice, and your 'exchange' issues don't matter. Please do the above thanks-