1. 20 Report a Spammer threads per week done by every moderator including sectionals(approximately 10 - 20 minutes).
The result?
20 staff members (not including admins) * 20 reports = 400 reports done per week.
The average number of reports per week submitted is 280 - 420.
2. With regard to Report a Scammer, every staff member doing 5 reports a week would actually clear out the section(approximately 5 - 10 minutes).
There would be times when a moderator is unavailable(such as vacation), which is fine. Although generally speaking there's no excuse to miss these numbers. Any moderator who cannot give 15 to 30 minutes a week shouldn't be moderator. Simply give them a two week warning period and then remove their status.
I'm sick of the inactively here, while compared to others forums that have efficient teams. Other forums aren't afraid to replace inactive staff members so the forum can function well.
For instance you have scammers such as this person who were reported over a month and a half ago yet aren't banned. >_<
I've been told there are already staff activity requirements, but they obviously aren't enough if we have 31 pages of reports. Please adopt these or at least let the community discuss them.
Please post your thoughts and vote in the poll.
Add:
<Darren> they need to handle like
<Darren> X number of spam reports a week or something
<Nick_> yeah
<Nick_> but no one does them
<Nick_> i didnt anyway
Finniscool, you're an administrator who would be willing to act on these rules(assuming they still exist) or at least strengthen them. Come on. D:
The result?
20 staff members (not including admins) * 20 reports = 400 reports done per week.
The average number of reports per week submitted is 280 - 420.
2. With regard to Report a Scammer, every staff member doing 5 reports a week would actually clear out the section(approximately 5 - 10 minutes).
There would be times when a moderator is unavailable(such as vacation), which is fine. Although generally speaking there's no excuse to miss these numbers. Any moderator who cannot give 15 to 30 minutes a week shouldn't be moderator. Simply give them a two week warning period and then remove their status.
I'm sick of the inactively here, while compared to others forums that have efficient teams. Other forums aren't afraid to replace inactive staff members so the forum can function well.
For instance you have scammers such as this person who were reported over a month and a half ago yet aren't banned. >_<
I've been told there are already staff activity requirements, but they obviously aren't enough if we have 31 pages of reports. Please adopt these or at least let the community discuss them.
Please post your thoughts and vote in the poll.
Add:
<Darren> they need to handle like
<Darren> X number of spam reports a week or something
<Nick_> yeah
<Nick_> but no one does them
<Nick_> i didnt anyway
Finniscool, you're an administrator who would be willing to act on these rules(assuming they still exist) or at least strengthen them. Come on. D:






























