Oh my...How can a person do this?

[Fromaaz]

* Used for adult wrestling moves copied from a Playstation game;


* Flung against the wall;

I lol'd

WOW thats fucking sick, if it was someone you knew that it happened to (a friend) and i came to a thread and said that bullshit how would you feel about it. Have some fucking sympathy even if u dont give a shit dont post it u faggot..

This made me laugh too.

 

[†Tysonâ€Â]

Almost everything I hear I have that same reaction to, but to this, I just can't.

Same here. I always think things similiar to this are amusing but i don't find this case funny at all.

That is just wrong how someone can cause so much pain over a long period of time. If the people simply shot her in the head and thats it i would've been like "cool" or if she just got burnt alive i'd be like "unlucky" but this is just purely mean. I don't think i'd ever be able to do that to anyone or watch that happen.

Also the fact that shes completely innocent, shes 3 years old. If she was like 15 and deserved it then i wouldn't care. But shes innocent and did nothing to deserve it.

If i saw those people do that to her i'd kill them.

 

[Swan]

WOW thats fucking sick, if it was someone you knew that it happened to (a friend) and i came to a thread and said that bullshit how would you feel about it. Have some fucking sympathy even if u dont give a shit dont post it u faggot..

Teehee, Amusing.

To be honest, getting angry over the internet makes me laugh. Besides, don't you think different opinions make up a userbase? Do you think everyone is going to think the same way as you? Similarly, opinions can be expressed in topics inviting opinions to be expressed, such as this one.

If it was someone I knew, i.e. A friend, I wouldn't intervene - the police would. Nonetheless, no-one I care about suffers from physical violence, so that doesn't apply.

 

[$tom]

thats the mosted fucked up thing ive read all day.

 

[nuke4russia]

I have words for them... But I'd get banned if I said them. But, I'll say them anyway.


What the fuck. They are fucked in the head treating a child like that. They should be anally raped and put in a state penitentiary for life. I bet that they are fucking ******s too, if they didn't want the kid, the least they could've done was put the kid up for adoption, but I mean, WHAT THE FUCK!


*Wanders off to register a new account in case I get banned for Racism*

 

[MatthewGor123]

This is absolutely ridiculous. I sure as hell hope the brothers had some form of mental disability (it is still OBVIOUSLY not justifiable, but at least it sheds a ray of light on the situation). This is just so... ugh. Thank fucking goodness the brothers got convicted, they deserve this shit. Maybe they will learn how it feels to get the shit beaten out of them, their heads bashed against the walls, etc. I also guess I almost feel relieved the child died; imagine the trauma [physical AND emotional] the child would have when they grew up. My god.

 

[FlubbyWubs]

Yeah^. Sick and disgusting... I mean looking at a young child one should see how defenseless they are. Picking on them, and hurting them just shows how much of a pussy they really are, because if they ever did it to someone of their own size they would get the living shit beat out of them. Its pathetic, and I hope some guy named bubba annal rapes these 2 brothers every night, making them say "I like it rough" while there rotting in jail.

 

[MatthewGor123]

Yeah^. Sick and disgusting... I mean looking at a young child one should see how defenseless they are. Picking on them, and hurting them just shows how much of a pussy they really are, because if they ever did it to someone of their own size they would get the living shit beat out of them. Its pathetic, and I hope some guy named bubba annal rapes these 2 brothers while there in jail.

I've read somewhere that people who:

1. Victimize defenseless people (*cough little children??*
2. Did crimes against the family
3. Sexually abuse people (though it's not recorded...can you really doubt it? They did mention tons of "ill treatment" in the article - they did all this other crazy shit, is it illogical to assume?

are more likely to be brutally targetted in jail. Let's just hope the statistics hold up for these two fuckers.

 

[FlubbyWubs]

To be honest I have no idea what you just said lol. Very confusing..

 

[MatthewGor123]

To be honest I have no idea what you just said lol. Very confusing..

Lol, read it again. I forgot to close the

1. command, so it looked retarded, lulz. I was just accentuating what you said 2 posts ago. This thread is really making me sick. I'm gonna have to stop posting on it. All I'll say is: best wishes to the NOT crazy people in the girl's family (do any exist?!? It talked about like cousins, parents, etc!), and I hope everyone who harmed her rots in hell or jail/lives the shittiest life of all time [no I don't believe in hell, but I'm sure these fuckers do].

 

[FlubbyWubs]

Ahhhhh alright lol. I was like "list[ijnferungweng]21m j3nr325^" WHAT?! Lol, but yeah I see what your saying.

 

[K-3-V-1-N]

That's how little boys act. It's the mother's fault for not intervening.

 

[FlubbyWubs]

That's how little boys act. It's the mother's fault for not intervening.

Thats how little boys act?!!!!! So your saying all little boys take their sister and bash their head into a brick wall? They all light her on fire, and they all hang her by a clothes line? All "NORMAL" boys do that? Please shut up and go away, your the more ignorant person I've ever met.

If you think this is how boys are supposed to act then 1 of 2 things has happened to you. (Or both)
1) You have done some of these things, physicking yourself into thinking its "normal"
2) It has been done to you, therefore the abuser told you it was "normal"
Which is it?

 

[K-3-V-1-N]

Thats how little boys act?!!!!! So your saying all little boys take their sister and bash their head into a brick wall? They all light her on fire, and they all hang her by a clothes line? All "NORMAL" boys do that? Please shut up and go away, your the more ignorant person I've ever met.

If you think this is how boys are supposed to act then 1 of 2 things has happened to you. (Or both)
1) You have done some of these things, physicking yourself into thinking its "normal"
2) It has been done to you, therefore the abuser told you it was "normal"
Which is it?

* Kicked in the face, causing her nose to bleed;
* Hit, slapped, punched and jumped on;
* Objects such as shoes thrown at her;
* Verbal insults, for example continually being told she was ugly;
* Forced into a television cabinet drawer;
* Dragged through the sandpit half-naked;
* Shoved into piles of rubbish;
* Made to bathe in cold water in mid-winter;
* Folded into a sofa and sat on;
* Flung against the wall;
* Held high in the air and dropped to the floor;
* Used for adult wrestling moves copied from a Playstation game;
* Whirled rapidly on a rotary clothesline until flung off;
* Put into a tumble dryer and spun on high temperature;
* Had her head and feet dangled into the fireplace when the fire was lit;
* Kicked repeatedly in the head because she was crying;


Yes, killing your sister is not what normal little boys do. It is normal to rough house and be agressive. The point is, these kids were not stopped, and most likely thought their behavior was acceptable.

And you call me ignorant? I like your options. It must of been one of those two.

 

[FlubbyWubs]

* Kicked in the face, causing her nose to bleed;
* Hit, slapped, punched and jumped on;
* Objects such as shoes thrown at her;
* Verbal insults, for example continually being told she was ugly;
* Forced into a television cabinet drawer;
* Dragged through the sandpit half-naked;
* Shoved into piles of rubbish;
* Made to bathe in cold water in mid-winter;
* Folded into a sofa and sat on;
* Flung against the wall;
* Held high in the air and dropped to the floor;
* Used for adult wrestling moves copied from a Playstation game;
* Whirled rapidly on a rotary clothesline until flung off;
* Put into a tumble dryer and spun on high temperature;
* Had her head and feet dangled into the fireplace when the fire was lit;
* Kicked repeatedly in the head because she was crying;


Yes, killing your sister is not what normal little boys do. It is normal to rough house and be agressive. The point is, these kids were not stopped, and most likely thought their behavior was acceptable.

And you call me ignorant? I like your options. It must of been one of those two.

And what happens if there was no one there to stop it? Is it still justifiable? Plus the kids aren't stupid, they know the difference between being playful and literally KILLING their sister. Also, why your taking sides with the brothers is beyond me..

 

[K-3-V-1-N]

And what happens if there was no one there to stop it? Is it still justifiable? Plus the kids aren't stupid, they know the difference between being playful and literally KILLING their sister. Also, why your taking sides with the brothers is beyond me..

If no one was there to teach you right from wrong, and you kill someone, are you in the wrong under law? Yes. You see nothing wrong with the mother not stopping her two sons from beating and eventually killing her daughter? They're kids and there should be someone to teach them what is and what isn't acceptable.

Do they really know that difference? I wasn't at that trial, and I really haven't gotten any real details. If you shit on the carpet as a child, and no one tells you that you should do it in the toilet, what's to stop you from doing it?

I'm not taking sides. Under the law the boys are in the wrong. Although this could of been avoided ( again I'm guessing, since we don't know the details ) that the mother could of prevented this.

 

[MatthewGor123]

* Kicked in the face, causing her nose to bleed;
* Hit, slapped, punched and jumped on;
* Objects such as shoes thrown at her;
* Verbal insults, for example continually being told she was ugly;
* Forced into a television cabinet drawer;
* Dragged through the sandpit half-naked;
* Shoved into piles of rubbish;
* Made to bathe in cold water in mid-winter;
* Folded into a sofa and sat on;
* Flung against the wall;
* Held high in the air and dropped to the floor;
* Used for adult wrestling moves copied from a Playstation game;
* Whirled rapidly on a rotary clothesline until flung off;
* Put into a tumble dryer and spun on high temperature;
* Had her head and feet dangled into the fireplace when the fire was lit;
* Kicked repeatedly in the head because she was crying;


Yes, killing your sister is not what normal little boys do. It is normal to rough house and be agressive. The point is, these kids were not stopped, and most likely thought their behavior was acceptable.

And you call me ignorant? I like your options. It must of been one of those two.

There is a very, very clear distinction between rough-housing/being aggressive and being malignant and having a desire to inflict pain for personal satisfaction (confidence).

I am all for wrestling with younger siblings to teach them lessons about life. But there's obviously a certain line, and it's obvious that these people crossed it.

Do you think there was a malignant or a playful intention behind, oh - let's see - forcing the 3-year old girl to be held above a fireplace? How about in throwing her viciously against a wall? [SARCASM]Hmm, you're right. I totally think it's right that you do stuff like this to a completely defenseless victim, because both people obviously enjoy it a lot.How about the human-limits experiments the Nazis used against the people (mostly Jews) in concentration camps? I guess those were just typical actions of being aggressive and rough housing as well.[/SARCASM].

I don't see your position at all, because your first two posts have just been retarded.

If no one was there to teach you right from wrong, and you kill someone, are you in the wrong under law? Yes. You see nothing wrong with the mother not stopping her two sons from beating and eventually killing her daughter? They're kids and there should be someone to teach them what is and what isn't acceptable.

Do they really know that difference? I wasn't at that trial, and I really haven't gotten any real details. If you shit on the carpet as a child, and no one tells you that you should do it in the toilet, what's to stop you from doing it?

I'm not taking sides. Under the law the boys are in the wrong. Although this could of been avoided ( again I'm guessing, since we don't know the details ) that the mother could of prevented this.

BTW; the mother got charged for manslaughter. She's fucking stupid as well. But at age 22, you have all the priveleges of a fully-grown adult. You can drive. You can buy alcohol. You can consent to marriage. You can literally make choices ALONE that will alter your life. I'm not placing the fault entirely on the boys, per say, but everyone knows what it's like to feel pain. And everyone knows that being burned or having your head bashed into a wall is PAINFUL. So come on, don't give me that "they didn't know any better" bullshit. And if they didn't, then it's their own fault - by 22 years old, you should have learned some stuff for yourself from society, not from your parents.

 

[FlubbyWubs]

There is a very, very clear distinction between rough-housing/being aggressive and being malignant and having a desire to inflict pain for personal satisfaction (confidence).

I am all for wrestling with younger siblings to teach them lessons about life. But there's obviously a certain line, and it's obvious that these people crossed it.

Do you think there was a malignant or a playful intention behind, oh - let's see - forcing the 3-year old girl to be held above a fireplace? How about in throwing her viciously against a wall? [SARCASM]Hmm, you're right. I totally think it's right that you do stuff like this to a completely defenseless victim, because both people obviously enjoy it a lot.How about the human-limits experiments the Nazis used against the people (mostly Jews) in concentration camps? I guess those were just typical actions of being aggressive and rough housing as well.[/SARCASM].

I don't see your position at all, because your first two posts have just been retarded.

Whoooop! Thank you. Someone with intelligence (not saying you don't kevin, just saying mat does )

 

[K-3-V-1-N]

I fail. They're teenagers and above. I close my case.

I imagined two 10 year old kids for some reason. I should really pay closer attention.

/dies.

 

[FlubbyWubs]

I fail. They're over teenagers and above. I close my case.

I imagined two 10 year old kids for some reason. I should really pay closer attention.

/dies.

Rofl. Good argument though. If it was a case between two 8 year olds I would be agreeing with you.