Evidence against Leanbean

Why are you even letting people talk about an open scam report? Seems like it should be none of our business unless there is unfair treatment or a shitty verdict.

It was already closed as a hacking pretty sure. The user made a new one when the shitty verdict came up.

 

SuF: http://www.sythe.org/report-scammer-archive/1737721-leanbean901-global-mod-scammer-2000-a.html

It was already closed and dismissed. We're trying to get it brought back to light.

 

[Tyler]

Coincidence you mean? Stfu. You're stupid.

I even said it was a typo. please keep flaming its so nice.

Can you check my scam report. According to rules it doesn't specify when only if. Thus Leanbean901 should be banned.

You had some credibility here. But again this should be common sense for EVERY trade as its posted everywhere on the site.

 

The report was closed as it would be with any other user who said their Skype was hacked and there was no PM. Apparently that's an issue. People are free to aid with discussion and present anything that may help with the case.

 

[SuF]

SuF: http://www.sythe.org/report-scammer-archive/1737721-leanbean901-global-mod-scammer-2000-a.html

It was already closed and dismissed. We're trying to get it brought back to light.

Oh alright.

 

[Honest Iago]

Not commenting on this all that much but when I switched to my newest computer around 75% of my chat logs from the last week or so came with me. Just commenting on my experience on the matter.

Most likely because you were on the same internet.

 

[Honest Iago]

The report was closed as it would be with any other user who said their Skype was hacked and there was no PM. Apparently that's an issue. People are free to aid with discussion and present anything that may help with the case.

THERE WAS A PM.

 

[SuF]

THERE WAS A PM.

Link proof.

 

THERE WAS A PM.

The PM has to be recent, as all other cases are handled. We already sorted out that you were at fault for not receiving a PM.

Now it's just a case of seeing if Leanbean was actually hacked or not.

 

I have my faith in my good chum Justin. This is why pm's are essential mother fuckers.

 

[AdamsGoldShop]

thing is if someone pmed lean about redeeming moneypak and the costumer didnt ask for a PM, he knew that he can scam it without any trouble

 

[O Lattes Forget]

The PM has to be recent, as all other cases are handled. We already sorted out that you were at fault for not receiving a PM.

Now it's just a case of seeing if Leanbean was actually hacked or not.

The rule says to confirm their skype through PM which he did. And how would we go about checking if his skype was hacked?

 

The rule says to confirm their skype through PM which he did. And how would we go about checking if his skype was hacked?

You need to PM him again. The rule was put in place to ensure you got a PM for every trade to avoid stuff like this.

 

[O Lattes Forget]

You need to PM him again. The rule was put in place to ensure you got a PM for every trade to avoid stuff like this.

Where does it say that?

I agree. The rule is poorly worded. If a newcomer were to join and read that rule, they would think that they have done everything correctly. It does not anywhere say that the PM has to be for that trade. It simply states he must confirm his Skype onsite.

 

Where does it say that?

It says it all over the forum to get a PM before trading - even in Leanbean's signature.

 

[Delta Squad]

wouldn't he need the email to get his skype account back?

Never had to recover my skype so /shrug

 

It says it all over the forum to get a PM before trading - even in Leanbean's signature.

Could have used that in his favor.

wouldn't he need the email to get his skype account back?

Never had to recover my skype so /shrug

I think you can contact a skype agent through their live chat, but you have to log into a skype account. I doubt they would give him any information regarding another account, especially since he faked his email at creation.

 

[O Lattes Forget]

It says it all over the forum to get a PM before trading - even in Leanbean's signature.

And he did request a PM.. It never says in the rules before every trade.

Could have used that in his favor.

This is true. Not saying he did.. but he could have.

 

And he did request a PM..

A month prior. The rule was put in place to avoid you from trading with someone who gets hacked.

 

[SuF]

A month prior. The rule was put in place to avoid you from trading with someone who gets hacked.

This. Before every trade.