• Log in or sign up for an account here: https://www.sythe.org/login

World War 3 rumored to happen soon?

will there possibly be a world War 3?

  • Yes

    Votes: 7 41.2%
  • No

    Votes: 10 58.8%

  • Total voters
    17

dany925

Active Member

$5 USD Donor New
Joined
Jan 1, 2014
Sythe Gold
194
Messages
172
So rumors saying, russia,China and Syria will Unite to take down the U.S.
I know they have been talking about this for many years but it seems like it will happen anytime soon. This war world 3 has nothing to do with racial. This war has to do with Power. I know that China are somewhat allied with The United States, bUT this is a little to political. This world War 3 can be avoided depending on who's going to be elected as President on November . I hope this will never happen I wish they can talk it out lol or else I'm gonna have to go to war .
 
<3 n4n0
STEVE
Former OMM
Fear-mongering. The U.S. spends more on their defense budget than the next 8 top-spenders combined (including Russia and China) and has the entirety of NATO behind it.

The Syrian government cannot even control their own borders and a military alliance between Russia and China would not be sufficient to take on the entirety of the Western States.

No, but the trillions of dollars that they've loaned us does.

This would matter if this were any other country than the U.S. The only reason the U.S. debt can be so high is due to the astronomically large GDP of the U.S. and the fact that the U.S. is the sole super-power.
 
Fear-mongering. The U.S. spends more on their defense budget than the next 8 top-spenders combined (including Russia and China) and has the entirety of NATO behind it.

The Syrian government cannot even control their own borders and a military alliance between Russia and China would not be sufficient to take on the entirety of the Western States.



This would matter if this were any other country than the U.S. The only reason the U.S. debt can be so high is due to the astronomically large GDP of the U.S. and the fact that the U.S. is the sole super-power.

All of that sounds good on paper. Hopefully it stands true and works out when shit inevitably hits the fan.
 
<3 n4n0
STEVE
Former OMM
All of that sounds good on paper. Hopefully it stands true and works out when shit inevitably hits the fan.

I'm looking at the poll and of course there's a "possibility" and when we use words like inevitable than yeah, it probably will happen (i.e. infinite monkey theorem) eventually.

I am aware that tensions are high in regards to Syria, but they are no where near the level of the Cold War and specifically during peak-levels such as during the Cuban Missile Crisis. Neither the U.S., Russia, or China are going to start a World War (right now). It would be devastating for world economy and unless one power gains a significant nuclear advantage and is able to destroy a nuclear triad with 100% certainty, the policy of mutual destruction is still in place. There is a reason the U.S. and Russia did not go into a direct war with one-another post WWII and it is not because they were friends.
 
Last edited:
The Idea of mutual destruction amongst super powers due to nuclear weapons needs to be rethought. Russia is essentially a landlocked country with very little access still to the waterways necessary for foreign trade. A war is not simply fought with bullets, the U.S and numerous other EU countries backing western states will ensure safeguards of the only 2 waterway accesses Russia has.

Besides that nuclear weapons aren't even the most devistating weapons we have. Defense systems have very high success rates and in terms of nuclear weapons, all systems would be used to deter the threat. Russia is a poor country that pumps alot into military infrastructure but it's not solely about who has the bigger gun. The U.S has more weapons, more allies, huge buffer zone surrounding Russia. Chinese backing to Russia would require mobilization that would be detected years before a strike was implicated by those allied against the U.S.


WW3 won't happen. A more likely scenario is Russia pushing further to annex areas that will allow better mobilization and establishment of forward defense line. The U.S "minor intervention" is not true and behind scenes i can assure you operations are ongoing obtaining strategic moves made by any enemy of the states. The U.S has more than enough power and capabilities to shut down massive escalations such as WW3 before they arise.
 
<3 n4n0
STEVE
Former OMM
The Idea of mutual destruction amongst super powers due to nuclear weapons needs to be rethought. Russia is essentially a landlocked country with very little access still to the waterways necessary for foreign trade. A war is not simply fought with bullets, the U.S and numerous other EU countries backing western states will ensure safeguards of the only 2 waterway accesses Russia has.

Besides that nuclear weapons aren't even the most devistating weapons we have. Defense systems have very high success rates and in terms of nuclear weapons, all systems would be used to deter the threat. Russia is a poor country that pumps alot into military infrastructure but it's not solely about who has the bigger gun. The U.S has more weapons, more allies, huge buffer zone surrounding Russia. Chinese backing to Russia would require mobilization that would be detected years before a strike was implicated by those allied against the U.S.


WW3 won't happen. A more likely scenario is Russia pushing further to annex areas that will allow better mobilization and establishment of forward defense line. The U.S "minor intervention" is not true and behind scenes i can assure you operations are ongoing obtaining strategic moves made by any enemy of the states. The U.S has more than enough power and capabilities to shut down massive escalations such as WW3 before they arise.

Worth mentioning that there isn't multiple super powers. The global system is currently unipolar and the U.S. is the sole super power.
 
Runescape Gamblingrunescape gambling
Back
Top