That's SciFi. And I did look it up actually, in most of the books I've read, and guess what? The moon landing was not fake. What makes you think you know better than everyone else? Because you saw some photoshopped pictures on some radical idiot's site? Get off the internet, it seems to be having a negative effect on your brain. Explain to me, please, using legitimate evidence, how the moon landing was a "fake".
When will Mars be Colonized?
- Thread starter juvenilepunk
- Start date
That's SciFi. And I did look it up actually, in most of the books I've read, and guess what? The moon landing was not fake. What makes you think you know better than everyone else? Because you saw some photoshopped pictures on some radical idiot's site? Get off the internet, it seems to be having a negative effect on your brain. Explain to me, please, using legitimate evidence, how the moon landing was a "fake".
Sigh... You don't need habitable conditions. Do you think submarines are fake too? Humans can't live underwater you know.
And use a spellchecker, will you? Then you wouldn't write stupid things like "syfy".
Triggerfinger
Grand Master
If its 2030 you would still be alive?
...Most people live past ~35 so yes...
Well any planet that has water on is has potential for being habitable, that is why people speculate that there is a possibility of live on the moon, as a large percentage of it is frozen water, and water freezes from the top. So this means that it acts as an insulator for the water underneath.
Actually he is correct saying Syfy I believe they changed they changed the name a couple months back.
Brotha_Verac
Guru
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2008
- Sythe Gold
- 0
- Messages
- 1,532
There isn't a point for colonizing mars, atleast anytime soon...
Earth isn't even closed to being overpopulated because the entire population (around 6.6B) can live in the land the size of alaska and everyone can own a small property.
There are really no benefits of going to mars anyways, it would cost a lot of money that we can't afford to spend because of the economy, there are no resources available, and being able to survive there isn't likely to happen at all.
Earth isn't even closed to being overpopulated because the entire population (around 6.6B) can live in the land the size of alaska and everyone can own a small property.
There are really no benefits of going to mars anyways, it would cost a lot of money that we can't afford to spend because of the economy, there are no resources available, and being able to survive there isn't likely to happen at all.
the teacher
Forum Addict
The point of living on Mars would be the same as living on earth. You could potentially watch TV, use the internet go for a hike. Go off on an adventure looking around craters.
We don't know what lies beneath the surface of mars. It could have caverns the size of alaska, water, plants. maybe the surface is just a shell protecting the planet.
"Whatever the mind can conceive and believe, the mind can achieve."
~Napoleon Bonaparte~
We don't know what lies beneath the surface of mars. It could have caverns the size of alaska, water, plants. maybe the surface is just a shell protecting the planet.
"Whatever the mind can conceive and believe, the mind can achieve."
~Napoleon Bonaparte~
Grammar Nazi
Forum Addict
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2009
- Sythe Gold
- 0
- Messages
- 263
The only way human life could be possible on mars would be if it was filled with oxygen and a dome like structure would be played around it.
Its all conspiracy. I don't believe the Moon was EVER even landed on. Look at the images. Its Bullshit. And to think that Mars will be inhabitable any time soon is preposterous as well. We live here, be happy. You could be dead or suffocating in space
[SIZE=-1] Question: How can an astronaut cast a shadow several feet taller than his colleague who is standing a few feet away from him?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1] Answer:[/SIZE] [SIZE=-1] He is standing farther away from the arc light that is illuminating them both. I truly believe that this footage is taken on a film set, you cannot reproduce this strange shadow phenomenon with natural light, and that includes taking into consideration two natural light sources (the Earth and Sun) as many sceptics would have you believe.[/SIZE]
AMONG others
[SIZE=-1] Question: How can an astronaut cast a shadow several feet taller than his colleague who is standing a few feet away from him?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1] Answer:[/SIZE] [SIZE=-1] He is standing farther away from the arc light that is illuminating them both. I truly believe that this footage is taken on a film set, you cannot reproduce this strange shadow phenomenon with natural light, and that includes taking into consideration two natural light sources (the Earth and Sun) as many sceptics would have you believe.[/SIZE]
AMONG others
Its all conspiracy. I don't believe the Moon was EVER even landed on. Look at the images. Its Bullshit. And to think that Mars will be inhabitable any time soon is preposterous as well. We live here, be happy. You could be dead or suffocating in space
[SIZE=-1] Question: How can an astronaut cast a shadow several feet taller than his colleague who is standing a few feet away from him?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1] Answer:[/SIZE] [SIZE=-1] He is standing farther away from the arc light that is illuminating them both. I truly believe that this footage is taken on a film set, you cannot reproduce this strange shadow phenomenon with natural light, and that includes taking into consideration two natural light sources (the Earth and Sun) as many sceptics would have you believe.[/SIZE]
AMONG others
They had artificial light at the landing spot...
Also, explain the American flag, footprints, and other structures made on the landing that are visible through a telescope.
Um sir that is what professional photo editing does. And no they didnt, ACCORDING to the NASA videos. There was no artificial light lol
Wow, I'm saying that if you look through a powerful enough telescope, you will SEE these things on the moon. How is that "photo editing"? And you have to have some kind of artificial light to take pictures and record video so the statement, "we used no artificial light" makes no sense in and of itself.
And let me remind you that we have landed on the moon and mars dozens of times, were those all faked too?
If you want to just start referring each other to sources, take a look at this: http://pirlwww.lpl.arizona.edu/~jscotti/NOT_faked/
It will probably answer any of the criticism you have of the moon landing.
As for the shadows, if you didn't bother to read it out of ignorance, one is shorter because one of the men is on a slant and the other is not, causing the one on the slant's shadow to be bent and appear smaller, and the other's to stay straight.
JulianMariano
Forum Addict
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2008
- Sythe Gold
- 15
- Messages
- 368
If you don't believe man landed on the moon you're just... Wow. As for life on Mars, well, I don't think it's happening any time soon. Maybe within 200 years? I don't know it's too difficult to say considering I know nothing of our progress with research, funds, etc.
ßbôy ™
Guru
even if they do.. itll take them awhile IMO because dont it take like a month to fly there? if they wanna colonize it they'll need to transfer alot of technology.
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2007
- Sythe Gold
- 105
- Messages
- 2,087
If the moon landings are fake then i must not be really white.
I think it will happen but i do not believe it will be in our lifetime.
I think it will happen but i do not believe it will be in our lifetime.
Similar threads
