That also doesn't mean it's not true. The articles, specifically the last one I linked to, have made some very good points that support their hypothesis.
Just because they proved it's possible, doesn't necessarily mean it's evidence to prove we're currently computer simulations. Regardless, it does make you think.
The problem is the fact that there is too many holes, lack of formulas for certain phenomena, possible lack of power in our instruments for observations, etc.
Just because they proved it's possible, doesn't necessarily mean it's evidence to prove we're currently computer simulations. Regardless, it does make you think.