Unprofessional (n)

[Altruism]

Would I be wrong to say that is false advertisement? Being as you aren't a "$1,000" donor on this site, nor did you put the name of the private server. Understandable that releasing that information might get you banned, but you're using it in the wrong context to gain more views.

Although I do find it annoying when users proclaim themselves "trusted," there's really nothing you can do about it. They're just trying to attract attention to their service - [Trusted], [Experienced], [Cheap], [HOT!]; if you disallow one tag, they'll come up with another, and most of the time it will be bullshit. I think users should be able to figure out for themselves that they should be weary of anyone who self-proclaims themselves as trustworthy.

Also, there are very few users who have earned the "Highly Trusted" rank, and most of them can simply tag their threads with ex-mod/ex-admin/ex-OMM - they don't really lose out.

Hit the nail on the head Einstein, clearing I'm trying to "get more views", by listing what makes the account unique.

So how would me releasing the name of the server, or providing evidence from the server change the argument at all? That wouldn't change the way in which you think the context of the title is being used, but ok.

 

[Syed]

Are you people really this retarded, obviously the twc wasn't warranted, that shit was in the title because it was directly related to what he was selling, if someone makes an account thread without proof does he get a fucking twc or a locked thread?

Obviously the latter, jesus fucking christ, the stupidity in this thread is overwhelming.

 

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 8 (7 members and 1 guests)
Dialatic, Aurola, BGlave, Cas_M, Heads447, Roary, Zeus

My boy Roary will fix this shit m8. He'll sort you out. I agree with my buddy Syed.

 

[BGlave]

Are you people really this retarded, obviously the twc wasn't warranted, that shit was in the title because it was directly related to what he was selling, if someone makes an account thread without proof does he get a fucking twc or a locked thread?

Obviously the latter, jesus fucking christ, the stupidity in this thread is overwhelming.

The title would be fine if he was able to provide proof which he did not. His excuse is he would be banned for doing so. If he could supply this proof to a staff member in the dispute forum this wouldn't be a problem. That's what the whole discussion was about /fp.

 

The title would be fine if he was able to provide proof which he did not. His excuse is he would be banned for doing so. If he could supply this proof to a staff member in the dispute forum this wouldn't be a problem. That's what the whole discussion was about /fp.

orrr ziggily could have asked him instead of get him a twc rofl like every other staff member does.

if someone doesn't post pics of an item they're selling, the mods ask them first, and if they continue not to update it, THEN remove thread/twc for not having it.

 

I briefly recall a PM, I believe I then asked in the Skype chat if anyone knew why you were TWC'd in case there was something else I wasn't aware of and then through either not receiving a reply or being distracted by other things it's been forgotten about on my part.

Generally on Sythe, when someone puts [1000$ donor] people automatically assume that it means on Sythe. That's just how it works here. Obviously this was a misunderstanding and had you disputed at the time, rather than now - and even though you say you have you only asked why you got it, you didn't appeal for it's removal - anyway that's irrelevant now.

Anyways, apologies for both the mistake and the delay in the removal. Proof would be appreciated through PM (I will post to confirm) or on your thread. Good luck with the sale.