• Log in or sign up for an account here: https://www.sythe.org/login

To kill Hitler or not.

I

il0vec0llege

Active Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2010
Sythe Gold
0
Messages
137
Ok so this is the situation your in the same room with hitler but he was a baby and hadn't done anything yet, would you kill him? I personally wouldn't because you never know how the holocaust not happening could effect your future.
 
This is such a ridiculous question. Of course I wouldn't kill him. It's a random baby in Austria who is completely innocent. What on earth are you getting at?
 
Hitler was a horrible, horrible man, but I agree with the OP, this would most likely become a huge butterfly effect. What if something WORSE happened because Hitler didn't take power? Russia had no threat, attacked the U.S.? Who knows, but I wouldn't do it just for that sake.
 
probably not. genocides and other things that kill a large percentage of the world population are necessary. without them, the world would be way too overpopulated and would be in complete chaos. that is of course assuming the world hadnt ended already due to problems caused by overpopulation...
 
Christmas 2014
Halloween 2014
Easter 2015
Homosex
What a stupid question, i don't even know what you're asking.
If hitler was a baby, you knew what he was going to do? Of course i'd kill him. This is unbelievably stupid tbh.
 
Potamus
Wait, do you not have an Archer rank?
Thats a question of philosophy and how our experiences change who we are as we grow up in life OR if our paths are set before us.

Either way, i'd drop a meat cleaver on him just in case. :)
 
angus07 said:
probably not. genocides and other things that kill a large percentage of the world population are necessary. without them, the world would be way too overpopulated and would be in complete chaos. that is of course assuming the world hadnt ended already due to problems caused by overpopulation...
Click to expand...

Why not let Natural selection go to work. Humans are idiots and one human can't rationalize another humans death under any circumstances
 
Sythe Awards 2011 Winner
Sure. Killing 1 man to save 6 million. If he never existed, who's to say there wouldnt of been someone else?
 
If there were no extremely serious repercussions to myself I would do it.

angus07 said:
probably not. genocides and other things that kill a large percentage of the world population are necessary. without them, the world would be way too overpopulated and would be in complete chaos. that is of course assuming the world hadnt ended already due to problems caused by overpopulation...
Click to expand...

Yes because if the earth had 20 million more people in the world the earth wouldn't be able to sustain them.
 
whippa craka said:
Humans are idiots and one human can't rationalize another humans death under any circumstances
Click to expand...

says who? your moral code? how about some facts? one could certainly rationalize another humans death.

i would kill myself if it meant saving the rest of my family. so either my whole family dies or i die. i kill myself. my death=rationalized.

wtp said:
Yes because if the earth had 20 million more people in the world the earth wouldn't be able to sustain them.
Click to expand...

I hope your kidding. i honestly cannot tell if you are being sarcastic or not. But if you are, here is my rebuttal:

i said things like that are necessary, not just that alone. We need genocides, cancer, etc. If these things did not exist, its safe to say the earth would be significantly more effed.
 
I would not kill him, seeing as he was basically the pioneer of genetic science. Seeing as his work is what led to the complete mapping of the human genome, which in turn helps us understand and treat many genetic diseases.
 
angus07 said:
says who? your moral code? how about some facts? one could certainly rationalize another humans death.

i would kill myself if it meant saving the rest of my family. so either my whole family dies or i die. i kill myself. my death=rationalized.



I hope your kidding. i honestly cannot tell if you are being sarcastic or not. But if you are, here is my rebuttal:

i said things like that are necessary, not just that alone. We need genocides, cancer, etc. If these things did not exist, its safe to say the earth would be significantly more effed.
Click to expand...

We don't need genocides. The people that have died from wars and genocides is insignificant to the people who die from other causes. Were not running out of land.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top