• Log in or sign up for an account here: https://www.sythe.org/login

The Moon Hoax

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivie
  • Start date Start date
Physics has always said it was possible to land on the moon (since galileo), and the V2 rockets have been around long before 1969. I think that it is true.
 
I too was going to cite the mythbusters...I believe we landed on the moon, but am not as knowledgeable as I should be on the subject.
 
all of life is lies/deceiptfulness who cares if we did or didnt, many still dont care lol
 
Gods_Earth said:
all of life is lies/deceiptfulness who cares if we did or didnt, many still dont care lol
Click to expand...

That post is not worthy of SFA.

How could the astronauts have passed through the Van Allen Radiation Belts without suffering the aftereffects of radiation?
 
bennytheberry said:
That post is not worthy of SFA.

How could the astronauts have passed through the Van Allen Radiation Belts without suffering the aftereffects of radiation?
Click to expand...

Dr Van Allen disagrees with you :rolleyes:

If you did the figures on radiation, you would see how astronauts could pass through the belts relatively unharmed. Did you do any research of your own before making this spurious claim, or did you watch some video on Youtube?

Furthermore, the spacecraft passed through the belt in 30 minutes, and the metal hull would have at least partially protected the astronauts.
 
The Fat Controller said:
Dr Van Allen disagrees with you :rolleyes:

If you did the figures on radiation, you would see how astronauts could pass through the belts relatively unharmed. Did you do any research of your own before making this spurious claim, or did you watch some video on Youtube?

Furthermore, the spacecraft passed through the belt in 30 minutes, and the metal hull would have at least partially protected the astronauts.
Click to expand...

Reverse Speech proves that the Moon Landing never happened, too.
 
bennytheberry said:
Reverse Speech proves that the Moon Landing never happened, too.
Click to expand...

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=IZs2bhvaTgU

So, why should that be proof that the lunar landings were faked? :rolleyes:

Besides, reverse speech has only ever been recorded when people have spoken "from the gut" i.e. unscripted dialogue.

Furthermore, the spacecraft passed through the belt in 30 minutes, and the metal hull would have at least partially protected the astronauts.
Click to expand...

Yes, partially protected such that the radiation was so attenuated, and the journey through the belt so short, that radiation could not damage the astronauts. Here's a friendly scientist who proves you wrong:

http://www.wwheaton.com/waw/mad/mad19.html
 
we went to the moon.
unless the U.S hires amazing GFX artists i thinks its highly doubtful.

lizardo75 said:
That is A pretty good question.
But why would nasa know so much about the moon?
How, if we never landed there?
Click to expand...

they could've just made it up?
 
Think about it; supposedly you landed on the moon on 1969... then why the hell haven't they been on it since then? With the advanced technology we have today we have not been on the moon since? I smell bullshit.
 
Just the line of "A small step for man, a giant leap for mankind" or whatever made it so cheesy it was not believable.
 
Discord Voice
Paper Trading Competition Participant
I saw all the videos and I believe that landing on the moon is a fake. The flag waving really convinced me, along with the fact that there was no blast crater.


BIT OFF TOPIC: Can anyone link me to a video about area 51 that is acutally informful and trustworthy?
 
In my opinion, we should not be spending millions/billions of dollars to go to the moon, to achieve what??
In my opinion we should be finding out what is at the bottom of the sea or investigating the beamuda triangle or something like that.
 
Yeah I agree with Java Lamp, after all the moon is just a big rock, at least there are intresting things in the deepest places of the Earth.
 
Shall SKill said:
I saw all the videos and I believe that landing on the moon is a fake. The flag waving really convinced me, along with the fact that there was no blast crater.
Click to expand...

You know, they put wire in the flag to give it the appearance of waving. It looks a bit better that way.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Runescape Gamblingrunescape gambling
Back
Top