The Moon Hoax

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5MVVtFYTSo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b309_YspwMk&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1CpNoI4WGc&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8qzDJwYjro&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZiCKy41zZMU&feature=related

Five part video aired by Fox.

Do you believe that the US landed on the moon in 1969? Post your opinion here with your reasoning.

 

Physics has always said it was possible to land on the moon (since galileo), and the V2 rockets have been around long before 1969. I think that it is true.

 

Mythbusters did a show about the moon landing, it got me believing that we actually did go to the moon.

 

NASA supported that episode and let myth busters use their equipment, obviously theyhad to say it happened.

 

Lol, yeah. I was going to say mythbusters too, its perfectly possible.

 

I too was going to cite the mythbusters...I believe we landed on the moon, but am not as knowledgeable as I should be on the subject.

 

all of life is lies/deceiptfulness who cares if we did or didnt, many still dont care lol

 

That post is not worthy of SFA.

How could the astronauts have passed through the Van Allen Radiation Belts without suffering the aftereffects of radiation?

 

Dr Van Allen disagrees with you

If you did the figures on radiation, you would see how astronauts could pass through the belts relatively unharmed. Did you do any research of your own before making this spurious claim, or did you watch some video on Youtube?

Furthermore, the spacecraft passed through the belt in 30 minutes, and the metal hull would have at least partially protected the astronauts.

 

Reverse Speech proves that the Moon Landing never happened, too.

 

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=IZs2bhvaTgU

So, why should that be proof that the lunar landings were faked?

Besides, reverse speech has only ever been recorded when people have spoken "from the gut" i.e. unscripted dialogue.

Yes, partially protected such that the radiation was so attenuated, and the journey through the belt so short, that radiation could not damage the astronauts. Here's a friendly scientist who proves you wrong:

http://www.wwheaton.com/waw/mad/mad19.html

 

That is A pretty good question.
But why would nasa know so much about the moon?
How, if we never landed there?

 

we went to the moon.
unless the U.S hires amazing GFX artists i thinks its highly doubtful.

they could've just made it up?

 

Think about it; supposedly you landed on the moon on 1969... then why the hell haven't they been on it since then? With the advanced technology we have today we have not been on the moon since? I smell bullshit.

 

Just the line of "A small step for man, a giant leap for mankind" or whatever made it so cheesy it was not believable.

 

I saw all the videos and I believe that landing on the moon is a fake. The flag waving really convinced me, along with the fact that there was no blast crater.


BIT OFF TOPIC: Can anyone link me to a video about area 51 that is acutally informful and trustworthy?

 

In my opinion, we should not be spending millions/billions of dollars to go to the moon, to achieve what??
In my opinion we should be finding out what is at the bottom of the sea or investigating the beamuda triangle or something like that.

 

Yeah I agree with Java Lamp, after all the moon is just a big rock, at least there are intresting things in the deepest places of the Earth.

 

You know, they put wire in the flag to give it the appearance of waving. It looks a bit better that way.

 

Yeah, I always ponder what/who is down there