[STAFF POWER ABUSE] This is embarrassing, multiple staff abusing this rule for there own benefit.

"If i am doing anything wrong let me know " you are mod you are supposed to be familiar with rules and shouldnt be asking around

 

I think its complex and as it would be hard to police, it needs either/some/all of these outcomes:

1) Allow it, but if monopolising is clear. Eg: 10 sites with same livechats etc, then restrict.

2) If 2 seperate businesses can prove they are seperate by providing backend business operations and finance reports, then they should be able to have shared live chat (refering to my experience more so here).

3) If users share a platform like playerauctions, then it should be considered the same rule as a website, based on how problematic it is, as i outlined above with determining whos sale from PA belongs to A,B, or C. And if the cash division after disbursements from PA to pp/btc/etc doesn't correlate with the claims made of who's order is who, then it should rightly be assumed a loophole.

4) Possibly create a subsection in the gold market for employees who also have their own businesses. This is a compromise as they wouldn't have a thread in the main section, but they wouldn't be denied having some form of forum topic. Such a subsection could be called "employee startup businesses" or "small merchants" etc. I'm sure somebody could coin the right terminology/description for this.

5) Allow same live chat, but set limitations on the employee side business topics. For instance, deny topics to fresh 'employee' sythe accs with low post count and modern creation date. Ie: employee has to have been on sythe for over a year or two to be granted the pleasure of having their own forum topic whilst working for a big merchant. This would stop the inevitable loophole being abused by some site owners having 20+ employees on fresh sythe accs spamming forum topics.

6) Implement an application process similar to the OMM 'getting proofs' system. For example, an employee wants their own topics so they have to go through a checking system to ensure no sketchy behind the scenes syndication is occuring. The outcome could be voted: yes/no by staff or upper staff similarly to how suggestions and appeals are made.


@ everybody: feel free to quote me and discuss any additional ideas to apply to mine listed above thus far. Criticism is also appreciated from both competitor gold merchants and other market users

 

Excellent investigation Broken Man. Sythe staff caught in yet ANOTHER scandal. It's always impressive the extent they go to in order to conceal or walk back their wrongdoings.

 

Mod Genstar Corruption/Gross Incompetence complaint

It isn't allowed at all actually, clearly states that you can only include onsite vouches unless the rule was changed now that chicks basically owns half the staff team

 

if this is allowed then am I allowed to have my own gfx thread while I work under @MoonGlare 's Viznary brand?

 

After reading the whole thread, my opinion is that a standard was set once Lime was told it wasn't allowed.

If this was a group of random users doing this, i dont think this would be being discussed as there is already past history through Lime to show that it is not acceptable and that thread would have more than likely been referred back to when sorting it out.

 

the door is now open @Jason if you dont succeed try reapplying for Mod first

 

If you expect a non paid staff to remember every single rule without making any mistakes by themselves you’re an idiot. Thank you.
Now to the thread. I personally don’t give a shit and I want @A Broken Man to stop pretending to be inspector gadget or some shit and stop trying to make himself cool by saying he “baited” Vlad and other shit. It’s so cringe honestly.
As you can tell this is spam but if there’s five pages on this mother fucker some people should be temp banned by now cx

ALSO CXXXX

This section is for feedback pertinent to Sythe.Org and its staff members.

It is not for:
Suggestions

 

actually i expect staff to know every single rule cause when they make app there is question wich asks " Are you familiar with site rules " and since she is mod that means she said "yes" that means she should know rules of site and not ask around to randoms . doesnt matter if she is paid or not nobody forced her to be staff member.

 

not only is that not correct, Chloe never filled out a moderator application lmao

 

how th efuck is she mod than ?

 

She was promoted before August 18th 2016?

 

There was a time and age where mods were appointed moderator if they were found to be an exemplary citizen of Sythe.org

 

Every member is supposed to follow all of the rules. You are making excuses for the people who are supposed to enforce them. The issue with Sythe staff is that they casually ignore the rules because who is going to stop them when they break them?

 

The only thing you can do is to bring some clarity to the grey area regarding this rule. I don't care whether or not they work solo or together, but make the rule the same for everyone. If they can do it, others should be allowed too.

However, if you agree to leave it as it is, you have willingly denied others from doing this in the past and potentially cost them a lot of sales.

 

I suggest appropriate action take place to all parties that were involved in this. We cannot have moderators thinking they’re above the rules and can abuse/find loopholes in the system whenever they want for their financial benefit. That is not the way a community is supposed to be.

 

As I remember she scammed someone that time surely "exemplary" citizen lmao.

 

So you want to hide evidence that shows curruption in staff team? Thats not how pr team member should be talking you should be working on fixing problem (punishing them for such things ) and not trying to hide evidence.