SMS verification

[Heeatz]

People who believe a donor is trusted are stupid. Yes it's a contributing factor to someones trust. But to say someone is trusted simply because they have donated some money would be idiotic. Staff are trusted people before they become staff, as the admins must pick people who wont take advantage of their rank and their powers.

Although I am strongly for it for staff members it's mainly because if someone were to gain access to staff account they could create a shit storm. However if they gained access of a normal account a hell of a lot less damage could be done.
The only reason I'd support it for high donors is because they have donated enough to pay SMS verification and extra protection on your account would be a very nice reason to actually donate more anyway.

You must have missed my sarcasm

I agree with what you are saying, and yes, it would give another reason to donate more to sythe.

 

bump dont let it die ;D

 

bump

 

[Yenthe666]

It's been discussed 1000 times. Would cost $3/month/user

I think thats a damn fair price if you have donated like 100$+ or when you trade a lot.
It would prevent a lot of hacking and is a very big addition to safety.
Why don't you guys put it available for those who wish to pay for it?
And you could make it like 4-5$ so that Sythe has some extra money for site maintenance or development.

That way he could never lose with the verification system, not even when there are chargebacks or something

 

[Laptop65]

I think only the admin team uses a similar system to this. Provided the person who wishes to use is happy to pay a small fee to cover the cost of setting an extra 'slot' up for their account, I don't see a problem with it.

 

[symphony888]

I totally don't mind about this suggestion. Instead, I'm looking forward to this feature, hopefully it'll be approved. Paying $3.00 for a kind of security is fine for me.

This will always add a layer of security, which will reduce[not totally prevent] the attempts of scamming/hacked etc.

 

[Yenthe666]

I totally don't mind about this suggestion. Instead, I'm looking forward to this feature, hopefully it'll be approved. Paying $3.00 for a kind of security is fine for me.

This will always add a layer of security, which will reduce[not totally prevent] the attempts of scamming/hacked etc.

Not to mention that its a pretty solid and big security layer.
Hackers would need the phone physically or atleast the number with a lot of troubles to get it 'cracked' or redirected somehow.

Its more secure than all the other options we have at the moment.
Seriously I don't understand how the option isn't here already.

 

[Dave]

Svu .