1.
"The only valid proof for an MSN conversation is a screenshot of the ACTUAL CONVERSATION WINDOW." Check
"If you have screenshots, POST THEM!" Check
"DO NOT CHOP OFF THE SIDES OF YOUR MSN SCREENSHOTS!! " Check
"Staff will not download your files. Please upload them and avoid using Rapid Share or any other similar places." Check
"Use an INSTANT MESSENGER for the trade" Check
"Show the MSN address. " Check
"Avoid videos where possible, take screen-shots instead." Check
Looks like I followed the rules.
Really? Where are the screenshots of the
trade?
2. "Scamming = stealing not mudering."
In life, whats the worst crime? Murder
On the forums what is the worst crime? Scamming
You take things MUCH too literal.
Or I take scamming as stealing because that's what it is =_=" I look at how it is, and I still believe you have created some horrible analogies in this thread.
3. You only defend yourself when your offended. Are you offended? If so I'm truly sorry for you.
You defend yourself when someone pulls into question your ability to do something. You've questioned the way I do scammer reports, I have defended myself. Thus you have pulled me out of RaS to answer this horrible thread you have created.
4. Possibility it was edited > Possibility it wasnt is what your saying. What your saying is pictures of the chat log aren't valid evidence. That makes me laugh because the rules for posting reports says pictures>video.
Yeah pictures are better than videos. I still look at videos though. The reason is that videos get produced with horrible quality, and you can't see certain important details.
Since your so sure that murder= scamming. Murder requires 100% beyond reasonable doubt to convict the suspect. There is doubt, and btw there isn't enough evidence for a conviction. So he's not banned.
Only admins can IP ban, and it will take far too long to put ALL the scammer that are banned through. Plus IP addresses can always be changed. What does this have to do with your thread though?
6. So... if screenshots = maybe hack or fake, what do you recommend? Please share that with me!
Screenshots of a trade clearly showing a scam (the entire conversation, not a single picture). Provide that and I'll ban him.
8. You sound like a blind man guiding me to safety. Don't try and assume that I'd do a bad job. Just makes you sound dumb tbh.
Judging by this thread, it's safe to assume you'd ban people with very little amounts of proof, creating large amounts of disputes and creating more work for the moderators that handle these things.
Therefore its safe to assume you'd do a bad job.
9. Right because there isn't a good number of users to choose from?
This has what to do with anything?
10. ' How will getting more mods help them get banned?' Someone said earlier that there are many reports and that is why it takes time to get through them. This makes complete sense. And let me break it down for you AGAIN. More mods = more scam reports read = people banned = less scams in the future. Crazy, right?
Yes but again I'll reiterate that this is about the moderators not banning scammers even though you think adequate proof is provided. If these moderators are kept to the standards of RaS your thread would still not be considered enough for a ban.
11. I'm encouraged to do good in school, and if I don't, there are consequences. Are there consequences on here? Why would someone want to spend their time reading reports if there is nothing in for them and if they don't have to. Heck I'd love to live a life of all fun and no work. Your point?
My point is that you have no point.
No my point is that if I'm doing badly at school, I'm not going to spend hours doing scammer reports. I'm going to concentrate on school. This is exactly what happened last November with me, my final exams came up and I was getting the lowest moderator logs because I was studying rather than actually moderating.
My point is that you have proved my point with the above.