I do believe the effect of being in a position of power for too long desensitizes one to the struggles of the common user. The will of good men cannot withstand the perpetual barrage of seeping corruption without the eventual crack in the metaphorical brass that encapsulates the moral compass. Let me ask you this, when he brandishes executive power to decide who should or should not be allowed to participate here, without audit by superiors stemming from tenurial arrogance, where does that leave the principles of basic justice? Our rules are not enforced objectively, but often subjectively from one acute angle, i.e. his. Are we being properly served by our administration?
I do believe the effect of being in a position of power for too long desensitizes one to the struggles of the common user. The will of good men cannot withstand the perpetual barrage of seeping corruption without the eventual crack in the metaphorical brass that encapsulates the moral compass. Let me ask you this, when he brandishes executive power to decide who should or should not be allowed to participate here, without audit by superiors stemming from tenurial arrogance, where does that leave the principles of basic justice? Our rules are not enforced objectively, but often subjectively from one acute angle, i.e. his. Are we being properly served by our administration?
I do believe the effect of being in a position of power for too long desensitizes one to the struggles of the common user. The will of good men cannot withstand the perpetual barrage of seeping corruption without the eventual crack in the metaphorical brass that encapsulates the moral compass. Let me ask you this, when he brandishes executive power to decide who should or should not be allowed to participate here, without audit by superiors stemming from tenurial arrogance, where does that leave the principles of basic justice? Our rules are not enforced objectively, but often subjectively from one acute angle, i.e. his. Are we being properly served by our administration?

