Christianity is a very widely believed Religion accepting that the world was created by a all-powerful being known as God. Before I start you first must know I will be talking about Creationists and Theists. Creationists believe in no Evolution or Big Bang, but they believe God made humanity from scratch. Theists believe that there is Evolution and Big Bang but they believe God started everything.
First of all we must understands Micheal Shermer's ten Guidelines of Balony Detection or as i preferre to call it "the 10 commandments of theory" if a theory does not follow one of these commandments it is probably wrong.
1. How reliable is the source of the claim?
2. Does the source make similar claims?
3. Have the claims been verified by somebody else?
4. Does this fit with the way the world works?
5. Has anyone tried to disprove the claim?
6. Where does the preponderance of evidence point?
7. Is the claimant playing by the rules of science?
8. Is the claimant providing positive evidence?
9. Does the new theory account for as many phenomena as the old theory?
10. Are personal beliefs driving the claim?
So i will be talking about Creationists, they believe that the world is approximately 6,000 years old. However, using Carbon Dating we can say that the world is more then 6,000 years old, in fact it is much older. Now, many Creationists choose to dismiss carbon Dating as false and fake, but then you are breaking rule 10, Data has no personal beliefs, it just is, also this supports rule 8 for scientists, and shows that Creationists have yet to show any of rule 8.
Some Christians say that God brings good will and loves all... a simple question can be asked, "why do bad things happen to good people?" Christians say, "God works in mysterious way" translated could mean "I don't know" Atheists say "Bad things happen to everyone at any one time, Regardless of there moral choices" People could ask, "If I don't go to hell and consequences are the same everyone, why shouldn't I just murder people?" the answer is "Humans can be incharge of there own Consequences and the Consequences of others, ie Law... People have conciosness and they still feel pain, and have loving families, so killing them would be still a very BAD IDEA"
God can be Disproven in a Theists eyes... What happened before the Big Bang, the universe was a small particle, it was fully compacted and was extremely dense. The Universe was still expanding in mass and energy and finally reached breaking point, this caused the Big Bang. The particle before the Big Bang was known as a singularity. the Singularity was not made up of elements or substance, it was only energy, so doesn't it sound rather odd that something as complex as a human or an all-powerful human may i add to be created right there and then? (PS: we have science to back up the Singularity so rule 8 applies.)
This may seem childish and some people may not take it seriously, but it is serious. "If God is all Powerful, can he make a weight so heavy that he cannot lift it?" If a theory has a paradox it cannot be true.
Some people ask "why try to disprove god" i say, if you believe in Imaginary things, you are delosional, and considering that most authority figures are christian, this is a bad thing, and this should be fixed. Some christians also try to answer unexplained questions with "God did it" Atheists say "We don't Know, lets try to find out" thus atheists expand the word of science and christians don't. (rule 5)
Also if you do not like my disproof and say that "you cannot disprove god" i simply say, "something that has no proof, needs no proof to be proven"
First of all we must understands Micheal Shermer's ten Guidelines of Balony Detection or as i preferre to call it "the 10 commandments of theory" if a theory does not follow one of these commandments it is probably wrong.
1. How reliable is the source of the claim?
2. Does the source make similar claims?
3. Have the claims been verified by somebody else?
4. Does this fit with the way the world works?
5. Has anyone tried to disprove the claim?
6. Where does the preponderance of evidence point?
7. Is the claimant playing by the rules of science?
8. Is the claimant providing positive evidence?
9. Does the new theory account for as many phenomena as the old theory?
10. Are personal beliefs driving the claim?
So i will be talking about Creationists, they believe that the world is approximately 6,000 years old. However, using Carbon Dating we can say that the world is more then 6,000 years old, in fact it is much older. Now, many Creationists choose to dismiss carbon Dating as false and fake, but then you are breaking rule 10, Data has no personal beliefs, it just is, also this supports rule 8 for scientists, and shows that Creationists have yet to show any of rule 8.
Some Christians say that God brings good will and loves all... a simple question can be asked, "why do bad things happen to good people?" Christians say, "God works in mysterious way" translated could mean "I don't know" Atheists say "Bad things happen to everyone at any one time, Regardless of there moral choices" People could ask, "If I don't go to hell and consequences are the same everyone, why shouldn't I just murder people?" the answer is "Humans can be incharge of there own Consequences and the Consequences of others, ie Law... People have conciosness and they still feel pain, and have loving families, so killing them would be still a very BAD IDEA"
God can be Disproven in a Theists eyes... What happened before the Big Bang, the universe was a small particle, it was fully compacted and was extremely dense. The Universe was still expanding in mass and energy and finally reached breaking point, this caused the Big Bang. The particle before the Big Bang was known as a singularity. the Singularity was not made up of elements or substance, it was only energy, so doesn't it sound rather odd that something as complex as a human or an all-powerful human may i add to be created right there and then? (PS: we have science to back up the Singularity so rule 8 applies.)
This may seem childish and some people may not take it seriously, but it is serious. "If God is all Powerful, can he make a weight so heavy that he cannot lift it?" If a theory has a paradox it cannot be true.
Some people ask "why try to disprove god" i say, if you believe in Imaginary things, you are delosional, and considering that most authority figures are christian, this is a bad thing, and this should be fixed. Some christians also try to answer unexplained questions with "God did it" Atheists say "We don't Know, lets try to find out" thus atheists expand the word of science and christians don't. (rule 5)
Also if you do not like my disproof and say that "you cannot disprove god" i simply say, "something that has no proof, needs no proof to be proven"
