Ugh, in my honest opinion, from the information that is provided in your report, that really should not have been a ban.
An attempt to scam should not qualify for an actual scam on the matter that the scam could end up following short and the person playing the con could rescind the deal. You never know what really happened... that person could've have really logged out at the very moment because of parentals, etc. It's happen to me before, does that make me a scammer?
Really, not the best of job, though it was a judgment call. Considering the fact that evidence #2 was more sufficient than what initially triggered the ban, I do not support.
As for his activity, I've never seen him post outside of the gold market and rarely answering spam reports.
An attempt to scam should not qualify for an actual scam on the matter that the scam could end up following short and the person playing the con could rescind the deal. You never know what really happened... that person could've have really logged out at the very moment because of parentals, etc. It's happen to me before, does that make me a scammer?
Really, not the best of job, though it was a judgment call. Considering the fact that evidence #2 was more sufficient than what initially triggered the ban, I do not support.
As for his activity, I've never seen him post outside of the gold market and rarely answering spam reports.













