There are still a number of problems with this testimony, the first and foremost being that I cannot verify it.
Here's a list of the crimes God has committed to mankind, shamefully ripped off of daltonator.netto be honest if there was a god and satan, then satan is a much nicer person.
in the bible it says god has killed thousands of people, and satan only killed like 3? and satan will except anyone into "hell" he doesnt care what religion you have chosen or anything, where as god u have to abide by stricked guidlines.
Lex Elf said:If god did exist than when someone says strike with lighting. It would happen
If god did exist than when someone says strike with lighting. It would happen since it doesn't he doesn't exist![]()
Their is no way to proove something doesn't exist, only that it does exist.
Show me that god does exist first then I will answer your question.
jebckr said:We can't prove it one way or another. So, let us use logic and decide for ourselves.
If only everyone used logic, unfortunatly about...oh i don't know...83% of the people in America fail to use the logic their very God gave them.
By the way, nice find Personal Jesus.
The Burden of proof is upon the believer. If it weren't, the existence of Santa, the Smurfs, and whether or not you are in the Matrix would all not be assumed to be false.
There are still a number of problems with this testimony, the first and foremost being that I cannot verify it.
![]()
Ehm I think If god exist than satan exist too![]()
For Christians, these principal beliefs are not just a doctrine but also a living relationship with Jesus Christ and can be summarized as follows:
- The divine Christ became human so that humans might become more divine.
- God created the world, so everything within it is good...
The whole of humanity is destined for eternal happiness, yet some may totally and deliberately reject God's girl of love and salvation.
Ughster said:Most legitimate believers already have all the proof they need, otherwise they wouldn't believe it. It comes from their own experience. You do not have the benefit of their experience to draw your own conclusions from the evidence, as you are limited to your own single perspective. So you utilize your own perspective of logic and analysis and are unable to find what they have found, so in your perception, it becomes false.
Ughster said:so it goes

