it seems these are becoming more and more popular. While I definitely think these do serve a purpose and have their place, they don't need to be used UNLESS the report must be private. I've done my time on the staff team, and I highly doubt the amount of private reports that should be privatecoming in have significantly risen; it's likely people just wanting to keep it private. There aren't too many instances where it should be.
This is coming from the John Devola/SahaGold report. John asked to see the evidence but it's private. Considering he's expected to pay out a debt from his previous partner he should be allowed to see the evidence, and there is no reason it should even be private to begin with. Should there be an issue with the company or either of the partners, it should be public so people know about that issue before dealing with either individual and/or the company.
I'm not taking a stab at anyone, rather I'm saying the people shouldn't be left in the dark, especially those involved in the report.
This is coming from the John Devola/SahaGold report. John asked to see the evidence but it's private. Considering he's expected to pay out a debt from his previous partner he should be allowed to see the evidence, and there is no reason it should even be private to begin with. Should there be an issue with the company or either of the partners, it should be public so people know about that issue before dealing with either individual and/or the company.
I'm not taking a stab at anyone, rather I'm saying the people shouldn't be left in the dark, especially those involved in the report.
Last edited:

























































































































