I'm just saying that it does mean something. How many OMMs or staff are stomping around with less than 1k posts.
I don't think anyone in this thread is trying to argue that it is the defining factor or trust. I think everyone knows that quality and quantity of vouches is what is important
I was staff with like 800 posts, so I can honestly say from personal experience. Post count doesn't mean a whole lot![]()
I agree it doesn't mean a whole lot, my point is that it means something.
Imo a person with a 2005 join date with 3k+ posts is less likely to scam than someone with a 2005 join date with 15 posts.
The person with more posts has more to lose as they have invested more time into this site.
It also means something simply because people DO use it as a gauge of trust. I'm not saying that people SHOULD use it as a gauge of trust, but because many users do then it does mean something.
(Also you are always an exception to the rule faggot)
You can't blame them. People are going to say anything they can to sound more legit and avoid going first, legit or scammers. This just prooves that people do hold the ideology that post count means something.I sense a little hostility "faggot"
I personally have seen people in the marketplace and read in missed msn convo's where I was invited to MM, but was afk, where one of the persons involved states, "I have more posts, I'm more active on sythe, so I'm more trusted."
Of course, no one is ever 100% trustworthy. We've all seen OMMs and staff in the past succumb to scamming. Though I still think in my example that the post count factor would make that person less likely to scam as opposed to the low post count person.I read these and laugh. It happens, and quite often in fact. I will never let post count get in the way of my decision of whether a person is trusted or not. When I first started on sythe, as a MM with 300~ posts, I had people with 500-800+ posts use me as a MM. They trusted me. They didn't distrust me because of my low post count. They took the time to look at my legitimate vouch count, which is what everyone else should do. I will agree with you on one thing, however. Using your example, two people with a 2005 join date: one with 15 posts, one with 1k posts. Sure the person with 1k posts has more to lose. But that doesn't mean he won't risk it. As a gold trader and middleman, I deal with all types of people. Leechers who just joined this month. leechers from 2005. Gurus from 3-5 months ago, gurus from 2005. Also as a Moderator, I've banned people from all of the above categories.
Like I've said, I don't think it's the defining factor, or even a terribly important one. Though you kind of admitted that it DOES mean something if you are still taking it into consideration, even if it's the last thing to considerBasically what I'm trying to say is, post count is the LAST thing you should consider when deciding someones trust value.
No why would they do that ? I think its built in with the vb code I may be wrong though. And also some people like having a post count so they feel they have achived something.
The irony of Gohan (Mr. One-Week-Til-20k-Posts) posting first in this thread is tickling. :laugh:
I've never given a second glance to a person's post count. As I say in any thread that insinuates post count matters, I couldn't even name within 100-200 posts of accuracy what mine is. I'm gonna guess..... 2200?
EDIT: Holy crap, I've been on a posting frenzy.
Iirc from when I had my own forums like 5 years ago, removing the counter is impossible but removing it from being displayed is incredibly easy. However, I will never suggest removing post count outright. There are several instances where post count is valuable; for example, if I was offering advice to somebody, as well as being a correlative reference to somebody's activity.
You can't blame them. People are going to say anything they can to sound more legit and avoid going first, legit or scammers. This just prooves that people do hold the ideology that post count means something.
Of course, no one is ever 100% trustworthy. We've all seen OMMs and staff in the past succumb to scamming. Though I still think in my example that the post count factor would make that person less likely to scam as opposed to the low post count person.
Like I've said, I don't think it's the defining factor, or even a terribly important one. Though you kind of admitted that it DOES mean something if you are still taking it into consideration, even if it's the last thing to consider
I think any smart person on here knows how to read vouches and judge legitimacy.
The thing is there are a LOT of people who aren't as smart and DO judge by post count. So a service provider or mill seller may lose customers who are judging them by post count, which means that post count does mean something.
Alright, lets take Gohan for example. Notice he has 20k posts? Lets pretend he didn't have any vouches/wasn't a mod/was plain. Would you trust him JUST because a spam-whores Sythe?
Some people would because of his join date is a few years ago, some others wouldn't because he has absolutely no vouches.
I could be like 20 post count with 400 vouches. I'd trust someone with 400 vouches/20 post count rather than 3 vouches/20,000 post count any day.
You could go through the guy with 20 post count and see that most of his posts are quality 5 paragraph posts.

