Sending a PM to Jake. I'd like to hear about how this kind of thing is handled too.
You might be able to dispute it if you can get them to take a deeper look into the evidence of the sale.
TeamTofu, thank you for the ping.
Apologies for the delay guys. Things at PA have been crazy (in a good way) and so I haven't been able to spend as much time on communities as I've wanted to recently, but I've cleared out some time to visit the backlog.
We do have experience with these types of scams, albeit they are very few and far between.
Strangely enough...the actual facts do not line up with the assertions made here. The reality of this case is such that the video evidence provided DID NOT meet our requirements, and because the seller failed to provide sufficient evidence,
we had ruled in favor of the buyer, check this super secret screenshot of our backend:
The OP unfortunately was not 100% truthful when he states that he had filed a chargeback after he lost the case (or we can give him the benefit of the doubt, that he just didn't remember correctly since it was a few years ago).
We watch out for these sorts of things. And whenever there is foul play in new areas of scamming, you can always ask for a manager to review the case, or ping me here.
It's unfortunate for the OP, as if he had demonstrated a little faith in our dispute process, he would have received a refund, instead of getting suspended because of issuing a chargeback. >_<