- Joined
- Apr 22, 2005
- Sythe Gold
- 23
- Messages
- 7,825
Since its inception, the pardon system has had some problems with it that weren't really addressed since the last reform (which was changing it from an Administrator's arbitrary decision to a staff vote).
Before this, these were the issues with the pardon system:
Before this, these were the issues with the pardon system:
- Users were never not allowed to request a pardon. This meant that after all the staff members who remember why a user was banned and support the ban are gone, the user can easily take advantage of friends on staff, or less knowledgeable staff members, to get pardoned.
- Being pardoned conditionally (ie. "Support with TwC + Market Ban" or "Support with Last Chance usergroup") is just another way of saying that a user is not trusted enough to be fully reprieved of their offenses.
- It really is disrespectful to the staff member(s) who put in effort investigating and giving the ban, and, in the case of a ban for scamming or hacking, to the victim(s), to have the ban just overturned unless it was truly a mistake. Our rules are not to be taken lightly.
- If the ban was for scamming, all victims must have been paid back, or at least contacted with an attempt at paying them back, before a pardon is considered. If any of the victims become active again, the ban will be reapplied until they are fully repaid.
- There is no longer any "conditional support" - (ie. "support, but with a permanent market ban/trade with caution/last chance usergroup") - staff supporting a pardon request must be fully confident that if the user returns, they are not going to be a further problem for the community, and that they truly deserve full reinstatement.
- If staff members or ex-staff members who were heavily involved in a user's banning do not support a pardon request, it may not be taken into voting.






























































































