rofl first of all, nice edit.
anyways back on topic.
i have a treasure hunt for you, in this thread i have posted many supporting statements for my statements. your job is to find them because i dont feel like posting them again.
there is a neat little chart on this thread also! it shows the evolution of the human skull.
Guess what I had a neet little chart too! it shows how logically with evolution of man, that we couldn't of been around very long, or there would be billions of more people on the earth. Because there is a chart, doesn't mean its true
I don't get much time to sit down with a computer, and I'm not really willing to waste the little time I get to try and hunt for what you support. It would of been easier for you to just post here
thanks for ignorance against the rest of my post
Dont get me wrong Shredderbeam, I love wiki as much as the next person who needs a fast source of information, I haven't looked at the article, but wikipedia is always full of holes, lies, and bias oppinions, ill take a look at it, but I'm not willing to consider wikipedia, unless the information is backed by a better source.
Within wikipedia so far I have read "best examples of evolutionary history" which is backed by a fossil found of a Hyracotherium or small horse, (about the size of a fox) that then evolved into the horse we have today? It shows no picture, of the fossil found, and only pictures, of what the exolution was THOUGHT to be like.
To my understanding this Small Horse is much like the miniture horses we have today. So from my understanding with in 54 million years, we have a normal hourse, and a miniture hose, but none in between. These are still both alive today. I am not saying the miniture horses of today are that same as the Hyracotherium supposidley 54 million years old, but it seems very similar
Further from my understanding from evoltuion, they have a gap of 100 milliom years, and from my understanding without clicking on many of the links, that there is no real connection between sponges jellyfish ect. "evolving" into a creature with bones.
From here I understand that evolution from one animal to another, is simple looking for common bones, or structures within the animal and looking for a similarity within another animal. If these bones, or structures, match then the animals are considered to be of the same ancestry, or "evolved" from the same animal.
Then after comparing these, evolutionists also look for common things such as, now this is an example givin in wikipedia, "Wings of bats birds and insects" "jointed legs of insects and vertebreates" "tail fin of fish whale, and lobster"
So far to me evolution sounds like looking for the quite obvious, or the chance of two things having the same structure, saying they must be of the same family, and have a common ancestor.
The article goes into boring geography, I skimmed, found nothing interesting
Please tell me if everything is correct so far, I must leave for now, I hope my views upon these things are correct so far