- Joined
- Nov 15, 2010
- Sythe Gold
- 1,682
- Messages
- 5,837
No I wouldn't. Brady led them down to be in a position to win and the Giants made a miracle helmet catch. The previous times we were in the super bowl we had the likes of Sergio brown propping up the back end of their defense. I'd say the 18-0 team is worse than our current team for sure. We had the amazing offense but we had no defense at all. We now have some balance and a defense that is stout. The times NE won they were known as a defensive team led by powerhouses such as Ty Law and Willie Mcginest.
Fair enough though with your pick, I thought it was largely up I the air until just recently. I'm trying to remain objective but no doubt a bit of bias is slipping in.
I don't blame you for being confident, especially with how Seattle had no business beating Green Bay, basically a slightly worse version of the Patriots.
It's like I said, as long as the Patriots believe in their offense+scheme, they CAN score pts on Seattle, even if Sherman + Thomas are near their normal output.
I'm just sticking to Seattle cuz I'd look dumb jumpin back on it now.


























