Mootrucks' Feedback Thread

Mootrucks · Jun 15, 2017

DesireX said:
Doesn't seem like an unbiased and righteous character that I thought mods should be!
Saddens me that moo choose the gambling degenerate scammer aspect over his fellow staff member veng. Moo was offering to buy 210m on behalf of aspect, but wasn't willing to anti scam that money and give it back to veng. Hopefully he doesn't get global any time soon.

Sorry for not anti scamming someone who I've taken thousands of dollars of paypal payments from, not.

DesireX · Jun 15, 2017

Mootrucks said:
Sorry for not anti scamming someone who I've taken thousands of dollars of paypal payments from, not.

Never lost a dispute due to all the information you take from people who send you pp? Why would this be any different, he's been banned for longer then 6 months now if you still take pp from him you're just retarded. Your moral compass just needs realigning is all.

Mootrucks · Jun 15, 2017

DesireX said:
Never lost a dispute due to all the information you take from people who send you pp? Why would this be any different, he's been banned for longer then 6 months now if you still take pp from him you're just retarded. Your moral compass just needs realigning is all.

I'll conduct business with whomever I want.

Soul · Jun 30, 2017

I love how this dude can handle matters so professionally! PMs me asking for my opinion on a matter, and when i give my opinion on the subject he calls me an ignorant faggot and blocks me! Wowza!

Mootrucks · Jul 2, 2017

Jason said:
I love how this dude can handle matters so professionally! PMs me asking for my opinion on a matter, and when i give my opinion on the subject he calls me an ignorant faggot and blocks me! Wowza!

Your opinion was very ignorant and I don't like ignorant people so I blocked you, thanks for the feedback but I won't be changing how I deal with people like you and will block anyone else who's close to as ignorant as you if I cross paths with them.

TheAnubis · Jul 2, 2017

Always a great guy to deal with both in services and on the website. Never fails to impress me with his dedication to this community. Keep up the great work.

Seraphic · Jul 4, 2017

Probably one of the worst moderators here. Provides a poor quality response and is extremely arrogant. It is not worth wasting time speaking to this moderator as you will definitely regret it.

Mootrucks said:
Your opinion was very ignorant and I don't like ignorant people so I blocked you, thanks for the feedback but I won't be changing how I deal with people like you and will block anyone else who's close to as ignorant as you if I cross paths with them.

I find it extremely funny how you call other people ignorant but then get very upset over someone telling you to stake 1b for 769m over odds staking. Nobody has the same amount of ignorance as you and you should work on managing your anger by attending some form of counselling.

Mootrucks · Jul 4, 2017

Seraphic said:
Probably one of the worst moderators here. Provides a poor quality response and is extremely arrogant. It is not worth wasting time speaking to this moderator as you will definitely regret it.

Seraphic said:
I find it extremely funny how you call other people ignorant but then get very upset over someone telling you to stake 1b for 769m over odds staking. Nobody has the same amount of ignorance as you and you should work on managing your anger by attending some form of counselling.

I blocked you because you're extremely annoying and guess what the majority of the staff members/users that have interacted with you feel the same way and have blocked you as well. My recommendation to you would be work on attending some counselling so you can learn how to properly interact with people one on one and maybe then you wouldn't be deemed the most annoying person on Sythe.Org.

Seraphic · Jul 4, 2017

Mootrucks said:
I blocked you because you're extremely annoying and guess what the majority of the staff members/users that have interacted with you feel the same way and have blocked you as well. My recommendation to you would be work on attending some counselling so you can learn how to properly interact with people one on one and maybe then you wouldn't be deemed the most annoying person on Sythe.Org.

The majority of staff members have not blocked me may I say that. I have a large chunk of Sythe staff who I still speak with today. You got offended when I clearly trolled you in the Discord and said to you to go stake 1b vs 769m in odds staking. I am unable to see how that is offensive in any kind of nature. Not to mention you tell me to go to counselling and deemed most annoying person on Sythe which was definitely a good laugh. Just because I don't odds stake or have any knowledge of odds staking doesn't mean you should get mad over one comment I made. Maybe if you adapt to the fact that Discord = Spam forum then you would clearly see that I was joking. I can interact fine with a large chunk of individuals. It is you who cannot adapt to a simple troll over odds staking. In fact I am 100% sure you would not have blocked me or held a vendetta against me had I not said anything about odds staking.

Mootrucks · Jul 4, 2017

Seraphic said:
The majority of staff members have not blocked me may I say that. I have a large chunk of Sythe staff who I still speak with today. You got offended when I clearly trolled you in the Discord and said to you to go stake 1b vs 769m in odds staking. I am unable to see how that is offensive in any kind of nature. Not to mention you tell me to go to counselling and deemed most annoying person on Sythe which was definitely a good laugh. Just because I don't odds stake or have any knowledge of odds staking doesn't mean you should get mad over one comment I made. Maybe if you adapt to the fact that Discord = Spam forum then you would clearly see that I was joking. I can interact fine with a large chunk of individuals. It is you who cannot adapt to a simple troll over odds staking. In fact I am 100% sure you would not have blocked me or held a vendetta against me had I not said anything about odds staking.

I tried to keep you unblocked for a long time I really did and lots of other staff members did as well but there's only so much stupidity one person can take. I would love to know how spamming people on every form of contact you're aware that they have is proper adequate, not to mention when I take longer than a minute to reply you throw in a question mark. I can assure you that's not how you properly converse with someone one on one if you don't want to seem annoying, but lets not even forget about how you spam people with calls on Skype and then when they ignore you on Skype you move onto Discord, you obviously have some sort of disability so i'm going to stop right here. Get off my feedback thread and work on yourself.

Seraphic · Jul 4, 2017

Mootrucks said:
I tried to keep you unblocked for a long time I really did and lots of other staff members did as well but there's only so much stupidity one person can take. I would love to know how spamming people on every form of contact you're aware that they have is proper adequate, not to mention when I take longer than a minute to reply you put throw in a question mark. I can assure you that's not how you properly converse with someone one on one if you don't want to seem annoying, but lets not even forget about how you spam people with calls on Skype and then when they ignore you on Skype you move onto Discord, you obviously have some sort of disability so i'm going to stop right here. Get off my feedback thread and work on yourself.

This is a feedback thread and it is clearly here for a reason. You did not "try" to keep me unblocked for a long period of time. Also, stupidity and trolling are two separate variables here so that is something that should be kept in mind. I do not spam call every single person, mind you there was probably only one or two who I had spam called and there is not more than that. I should also add that calling people is the best way to interact with people in the current day and age. You can message someone 5 times and not get a single response and yet you can call someone once and get a response in seconds. Also going back to your point of me "throwing in a question mark and not conversing with people properly", here is a conversation I've attached trying to be as polite and as courteous as possible followed by your arrogant approach:

You say to ask questions but yet when I ask questions and try to be polite you respond with "enjoy the Skype block". This is coming from a moderator and being a firm believer in professionalism, I do not see how your response is professional whatsoever. This is feedback and I'm here to give you constructive criticism for how to improve. No need to get all arrogant and be like work on yourself because no matter how matter I try and improve myself, you will continue to dislike me even though I continuously tried to be nice and thought that you were a good moderator but you decided to evolve for the worst and then blame it on the victim (which was me).

Dank · Jul 4, 2017

Mootrucks is the most professional mod I know, and when he deals with retards he lets them knows whats up. Mad respect bro. Don't let some arrogant retard get the best of you. Just ignore and move on.

Mootrucks · Jul 4, 2017

Seraphic said:
This is a feedback thread and it is clearly here for a reason. You did not "try" to keep me unblocked for a long period of time. Also, stupidity and trolling are two separate variables here so that is something that should be kept in mind. I do not spam call every single person, mind you there was probably only one or two who I had spam called and there is not more than that. I should also add that calling people is the best way to interact with people in the current day and age. You can message someone 5 times and not get a single response and yet you can call someone once and get a response in seconds. Also going back to your point of me "throwing in a question mark and not conversing with people properly", here is a conversation I've attached trying to be as polite and as courteous as possible followed by your arrogant approach:

You say to ask questions but yet when I ask questions and try to be polite you respond with "enjoy the Skype block". This is coming from a moderator and being a firm believer in professionalism, I do not see how your response is professional whatsoever. This is feedback and I'm here to give you constructive criticism for how to improve. No need to get all arrogant and be like work on yourself because no matter how matter I try and improve myself, you will continue to dislike me even though I continuously tried to be nice and thought that you were a good moderator but you decided to evolve for the worst and then blame it on the victim (which was me).

First paragraph... lets see, if someone ignores you 5 messages in a row take the hint that they're either busy or don't want to talk to you, knowing how you're it's most likely they don't want to talk to you 9 out of 10 times. You shouldn't be calling someone who hasn't responded to you, that's just common sense, something you clearly lack.

Now to address the second paragraph in your post, just like the the other paragraph in your post this just shows that you don't know how to talk to people properly when it comes to one on one, instead of saying "merge with this" and then separately saying "Can you do that for me, please" you should of gone about it by saying something like "Can you merge these two threads together" as it seems a bit aggressive/like you're rushing the person even though you're the one asking for a favor.

Seraphic · Jul 4, 2017

Also might I add that you're extremely professional responses actually led to individuals getting banned. I clearly asked for your help in getting a scammer who is now banned to check the IP audit to see if it was worth filing a report (since I wanted to aid Sythe in removing scammers from the community) as seen on an alternative Skype account I own here:

Not only did you refuse you check it but once I filed a report and he was banned, you clearly approved him being unbanned here due to a personal vendetta you held against me:

ipker10 unfair ban

I am extremely sorry to @sammybarcode but I tried everything possible in my power to get rid of a scammer but you chose to let a scammer back into the community. I am putting this feedback here so you can learn from it. I try to make Sythe a better place but it is stuff like this that causes a problem. I've not released this information to anyone in months but people need to be aware that your mistakes lead to people scamming in the community also. I might be stupid and annoying at times but overall I have got a large amount of people banned and assisted in making Sythe a better place.

Again apologies to @sammybarcode and @tylerson1 for this scam taking place. If Mootrucks decided to help out then this whole scam wouldn't have occurred.

Mootrucks said:
First paragraph... lets see, if someone ignores you 5 messages in a row take the hint that they're either busy or don't want to talk to you, knowing how you're it's most likely they don't want to talk to you 9 out of 10 times. You shouldn't be calling someone who hasn't responded to you, that's just common sense, something you clearly lack.

Now to address the second paragraph in your post, just like the the other paragraph in your post this just shows that you don't know how to talk to people properly when it comes to one one, instead of saying "merge with this" and then separately saying "Can you do that for me, please" you should of gone about it by saying something like "Can you merge these two threads together" as it seems a bit aggressive/like you're rushing the person even though you're the one asking for a favor.

Moving back to your first point, there was only 3 messages sent which is the average amount of messages a normal person sends before waiting for a response. The messages look like there is more since the profiles link to the images.

Also like I said before, I added the "can you do that for me, please" because I didn't want to sound rude. If I didn't say that then you'd be posting here being like oh I blocked you because you were rude and ignorant on Skype. I do not believe I have been ignorant or rude to you over Skype myself. I try to be polite although you clearly didn't appreciate me being polite and instead say that it is my fault for not communicating properly even though I am fairly sure and a lot of others would agree with me that what I said was easy to read. Not to mention, you were not doing anything better at that time except reading through spam forum threads and therefore I did think you would do it faster although it is my mistake if I misunderstood that those threads were clearly important to you.

Sunny · Jul 4, 2017

vouch

Gotchabro · Jul 4, 2017

MA NIGGA

Mootrucks · Jul 4, 2017

Seraphic said:
Also might I add that you're extremely professional responses actually led to individuals getting banned. I clearly asked for your help in getting a scammer who is now banned to check the IP audit to see if it was worth filing a report (since I wanted to aid Sythe in removing scammers from the community) as seen on an alternative Skype account I own here:

Not only did you refuse you check it but once I filed a report and he was banned, you clearly approved him being unbanned here due to a personal vendetta you held against me:

ipker10 unfair ban

I am extremely sorry to @sammybarcode but I tried everything possible in my power to get rid of a scammer but you chose to let a scammer back into the community. I am putting this feedback here so you can learn from it. I try to make Sythe a better place but it is stuff like this that causes a problem. I've not released this information to anyone in months but people need to be aware that your mistakes lead to people scamming in the community also. I might be stupid and annoying at times but overall I have got a large amount of people banned and assisted in making Sythe a better place.

Again apologies to @sammybarcode and @tylerson1 for this scam taking place. If Mootrucks decided to help out then this whole scam wouldn't have occurred.

If I don't want to do something at a certain time after being constantly annoyed by the person asking I don't have to do, you were more than capable of contacting another staff member and it seems like you didn't as you're trying to blame me for him scamming? Completely laughable bud, anything else?

Seraphic said:
Moving back to your first point, there was only 3 messages sent which is the average amount of messages a normal person sends before waiting for a response. The messages look like there is more since the profiles link to the images.

Also like I said before, I added the "can you do that for me, please" because I didn't want to sound rude. If I didn't say that then you'd be posting here being like oh I blocked you because you were rude and ignorant on Skype. I do not believe I have been ignorant or rude to you over Skype myself. I try to be polite although you clearly didn't appreciate me being polite and instead say that it is my fault for not communicating properly even though I am fairly sure and a lot of others would agree with me that what I said was easy to read. Not to mention, you were not doing anything better at that time except reading through spam forum threads and therefore I did think you would do it faster although it is my mistake if I misunderstood that those threads were clearly important to you.

Yeh once again, sorry to burst your bubble but if someone doesn't reply to you after 3 messages the same thing applies.

I already addressed this and told you how to properly ask someone to do you a favor, not sure why you're bringing this up again if i'm only going to give you the same response?