Gekkostate
Forum Addict
That method of argumentation is just plain moronic and Illogical, it's just like me using that same argumental process to say that it is possible for me to be god existing in human form, in a piece of the whole, even though i am the whole. While also some saying that it is impossible for me to be god existing in a piece of the whole since how would something such as a whole fit into such a small piece which was created by the whole?. Thus you cannot prove that i am god nor can you disprove i am god because i may or may not have created circumstances which will make me appear the same as you, i will experience the same things as you which would make it seem impossible for me to be god and yet at the same time i would be god. Seriously....
Thus I deem myself worthy of this 'god' figure and title which has been disputed since the day reason was introduced and my existence was questioned and even before that. I mean come on. I guess since people are so eager to put themselves into a false sence of security about dying and committing 'sins' that they try to turn to a false figure that was fathomed centuries ago to put to rest society about the idea of dying while also trying to create a society where 'sins' will be committed less. This would create a populos being run by a false figure with ideas created by a moralistic person to try and create a peaceful society. But so far all this has done so far is had people argue over it and have wars over it, people killed to try and force people to believe it. So since I have only recently decided to unmask my identity and take the form of everyone, this would also mean that all the fighting that has occured has lead up to me. BUT since i do not believe in god or any other religious figure would this not contradict itself since i do not believe god to exist, yet i do?.
Logic cannot totally explain everything, we are just Humans and with the 10 percent of our brain that we use, we came up with the best thing that we could think of to help us use a process to help us better understand things and to better explain which we could not understand before. Which as far as i can see, was logic. So logic, in essence, is already flawed even though to us right now and the capacity that we are able to function at, believes logic to be ultimate and all-knowing, a process that will light every cave, prove a one sided arguement. So on and so forth. We 'prove' almost all 'intelligent' arguements that we can understand using logic and for the rest of the unproveable arguements we also use logic (the process used to prove one side of an arguement and one side only), but in a way so that it is manipulated to 'prove' both sides of the arguement. We cannot prove something that noone has any viable evidence for and even if viable evidence were brought forth that either proves or disproves something, the human would be either be VERY ignorant of it and toss it aside or be TOO accepting of it which could turn out later to be false anyways.
Can anyone disprove this, the idea that I am god?
Of course they effing can't which is why those arguements are completely and utterly dumb to try and win. Why try to confuse people with your train of thoughts on a self journey on what you think you should worship?
Thus I deem myself worthy of this 'god' figure and title which has been disputed since the day reason was introduced and my existence was questioned and even before that. I mean come on. I guess since people are so eager to put themselves into a false sence of security about dying and committing 'sins' that they try to turn to a false figure that was fathomed centuries ago to put to rest society about the idea of dying while also trying to create a society where 'sins' will be committed less. This would create a populos being run by a false figure with ideas created by a moralistic person to try and create a peaceful society. But so far all this has done so far is had people argue over it and have wars over it, people killed to try and force people to believe it. So since I have only recently decided to unmask my identity and take the form of everyone, this would also mean that all the fighting that has occured has lead up to me. BUT since i do not believe in god or any other religious figure would this not contradict itself since i do not believe god to exist, yet i do?.
Logic cannot totally explain everything, we are just Humans and with the 10 percent of our brain that we use, we came up with the best thing that we could think of to help us use a process to help us better understand things and to better explain which we could not understand before. Which as far as i can see, was logic. So logic, in essence, is already flawed even though to us right now and the capacity that we are able to function at, believes logic to be ultimate and all-knowing, a process that will light every cave, prove a one sided arguement. So on and so forth. We 'prove' almost all 'intelligent' arguements that we can understand using logic and for the rest of the unproveable arguements we also use logic (the process used to prove one side of an arguement and one side only), but in a way so that it is manipulated to 'prove' both sides of the arguement. We cannot prove something that noone has any viable evidence for and even if viable evidence were brought forth that either proves or disproves something, the human would be either be VERY ignorant of it and toss it aside or be TOO accepting of it which could turn out later to be false anyways.
Can anyone disprove this, the idea that I am god?
Of course they effing can't which is why those arguements are completely and utterly dumb to try and win. Why try to confuse people with your train of thoughts on a self journey on what you think you should worship?
