Incest

[The Riddler_]

This thread isn't about pregnancy. It's about the morality of incest, not the possibility of conception.

Yes, but careless acts upon the parents make the children reap it.

How is this relevant?

It isn't, I was just asking your opinion on that situation.

 

[The Riddler_]

What children? As long as they're using contraception correctly, there will be no children.

I say the same thing, but there are slip ups.

I don't see why this shouldn't be allowed. It might not be entirely moral from my perspective, but it's their prerogative, and it would be extremely immoral for anyone to interfere.

It's their body, but it includes another


I'm not denying any facts, i'm just questioning/stating the obvious.

Also, going to sleep, if you respond, don't expect an answer for a few hours.

 

[K-3-V-1-N]

@Tyro - Of course incest is morally permissive. The majority of people in this thread agree with that.

Now, let me ask you this.. How would you feel about a father and a daughter having sex for the sole purpose of having a baby? And for the sake of the question, let's say that they are both aware of the possible negative effects it would have on their future child.

Personally, I haven't worked it out. I saw the word Nazism and my thoughts shifted from concern for the potential offspring to concern for the parents. If incest is disallowed, then where does the line end? And who draws that line? If someone can regulate who I can make a baby with, for the child's sake, could I stop two Jews from procreating so the child doesn't have to suffer through life with a huge nose?

 

[DropKick Murphys]

Now, let me ask you this.. How would you feel about a father and a daughter having sex for the sole purpose of having a baby? And for the sake of the question, let's say that they are both aware of the possible negative effects it would have on their future child.

I'd think it's pretty weird, but I certainly wouldn't stop them from doing so.

 

[Straggler]

It's sexually immoral. Why? The Bible says no (Leviticus 18:6-18). As a Christian I try to follow it.

Should it be legal? Maybe, it's a hard question to answer. If both people say it's okay and they feel right about it then they should be allowed to do what they want. It's just another government control.

Wait, what? The BIBLE decides what's moral or immoral? I don't think so. I think it's rather pointless. Why do it with your own flesh and blood? Is it really that hard to find someone? Not to mention the birth defects that can result, it's bad, unnessecary, and should be illegal. Think about it, would a guy who screws his sister make a good parent..?

 

[darth rave]

The answer to everything.

The first result will do just fine.

 

[Jimmy]

The answer to everything.

The first result will do just fine.

The bible also says that plants were created before the sun.

Do you adhere to that?

 

[darth rave]

True. But God made light before that. The light was probably the light from the Lord.

The order of the days means a lot. Something I don't understand so I'm going to try and say stuff.

 

[Darthatron]

Let them do whatever they want to each other, but don't let them breed.

 

[Sup3r 4ut03r]

I don't see any good reason from stopping two consenting people from doing something that only affects them.

It DOES NOT only affect them, as if they have a child it may have deformities.

 

[stayzer]

would a guy who screws his sister make a good parent..?

They might be a good parent depends on the fatherhood responsiblitys of the father not the kids also incest shouldnt be illegal if you do it is your body and your kids will hate you

 

[wizardzgame]

Any child that is conceived has a possibility to have deformities.
What about a woman with Downs syndrome, who has a 50 percent chance of producing a child with Downs? Would you prevent her from breeding? What about dwarves?

Clearly you do not see the point.

Is being a relative to someone a disease? No. You can however increase the chances of creating a child with physical and social complications. Is it really necessary? Nope. You better be safe then sorry. It's like you being an airplane pilot; you can fly the thing blindfolded, which is unnecessary and could possibly put people at danger.

 

[ImaGiNaTioN]

I fap to it.
/thread

 

[wizardzgame]

No. You don't see the point.

What if those two people are genuinely in love? Why should genetics play a role in their feelings towards each other?

I really hate this person. Can I kill them because I genuinely want them dead?

 

[DropKick Murphys]

wizardzgame, would you use force to stop two people from having sex just because they're related?

 

[Tarum]

Well , i dont wanna talk shit or something.

But aren't we all family if you Go for Adam And Eva.?

 

[Tarum]

Are you insinuating that, from a theological standpoint, incest is morally permissible? ^_^

Well i am just saying that this thread is nonsense.
And it's a religional standpoint. ^^

Dude all need stfu let ppl do what they wanna do man.

 

[DropKick Murphys]

Well , i dont wanna talk shit or something.

But aren't we all family if you Go for Adam And Eva.?

And if their kids were just Cain and Abel, how did those two have kids!
Aha! :laugh:

 

[wizardzgame]

Murder is morally wrong. You've said nothing about the morality of incest, only that it can create deformities when conception occurs.

Would incest not be wrong considering the risks you put at for the baby?

 

[wizardzgame]

Would it be wrong if it wasn't possible to have a baby?

What do you mean? That the people preforming incest cannot have a baby?

I honestly do not care about that, but when the quality of a human's life is at stake, then I do care.