Gah, how many times am I going to have to speak against the stupid burden of proof shifting posts. You can't disprove something of this nature. To prove that a God does not exist, you would have to be everywhere in the universe at one time checking for a God. But, we can't. Therefore, we can only make logical assessments of the situation. There is no evidence for the existence of a God. The only kind of evidence one can come up with is the "God of the Gaps" argument, and some kind of morality argument. Neither of these prove anything, in fact most of the time they undermine the idea.
This same principle can apply to Russel's teapot ( or any other object, he just uses a teapot for his example). If I were to tell you that between the orbit of Mars and Jupiter, within the asteroid belt, you would call the idea absurd. But then, I tell you that you can't disprove it, since there is no way we could see an object that small, especially among all the objects within the belt. It seems that I have no evidence, but I pull out a 2 thousand year old text that describes this teapot in detail. You would, of course, tell me that whether or not a teapot in orbit in the asteroid belt is written about in an ancient text has no bearing on whether it is actually true. But I say, you cannot disprove it. You would call me an idiot right?
