What constitutes adequate proof?

[Angelmax]

As of when is there any verification to the multiverse hypothesis?



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse

While the hypothesis may well prove true, at present there is no quantifiable evidence.

 

[PieAndChips]

While the hypothesis may well prove true, at present there is no quantifiable evidence.

Sorry for spitballing, but this is a Religious thread.

 

[Angelmax]

Sorry for spitballing, but this is a Religious thread.

In that case, while we're on the topic of unquantifiable claims...



Do you actually have anything to say? All you've done over the past page or so is repeatedly tell us to read the bible.

 

[PieAndChips]

if you want to debate this, add the msn in my sig?
Thanks.

 

if you want to debate this, add the msn in my sig?
Thanks.

I think you've got some shit caught on your phishing line.

 

[PieAndChips]

I think you've got some shit caught on your phishing line.

that hasn't brought anything to the debate has it?

 

that hasn't brought anything to the debate has it?

Don't ask people to "debate you on msn".

You've not even presented arguments worth debating; and even if you had, why do you need to debate privately? Unless of course there is an ulterior motive at work.

 

[PieAndChips]

if that's so i'll quit this debate then. also i think this thread should be locked until XequeR is back from his ban

 

if that's so i'll quit this debate then. also i think this thread should be locked until XequeR is back from his ban

Yes. Granted. But not because the OP is banned. Rather because there isn't any purpose to the thread. No one is debating the thread's topic.

If you have specific arguments relating to God or gods or theism in general, first do a google search. Read what others have written. Then if you still think you have a real argument to make, come post here; make your own thread with a title pertaining to your argument and then we will debate its merits there.