Ima chargin mah laz0rz.

[tommym007]

Apparently there will be a "phase 2" of the vote, which will instead be a no option. We must all DDoS the web page for the "no vote" once it's released.

 

[Determinate]

No real need to DDoS it tbh.

The number of no voters is going to be very low in comparison to the yes voters.

On the other hand, though, this means that the release of free trade and the wilderness will be in about a month?

 

[FireZ]

Take 30 days off and think about your statement

 

[uselesspoop]

LOL, OWNED. Wow, why is jagex tryiing to waste our time?

 

[BEYOND REASON]

Take 30 days off and think about your statement

FireZ I don't think he was being truly serious, anyhow I don't believe the number of no votes will reach anything over the amount of yes votes.

I wonder if it is possible to vote yes and no on a single name?

 

[Nyx]

The yes/no ratio is gonna be priceless.

 

[CrapInACup]

LOL, OWNED. Wow, why is jagex tryiing to waste our time?

To allow the small percent of users who don't want it to happen actually vote, and keep them happy. Therefore, overall making more money.

The same reason we even had to vote, and now our hopes are raised, and they are giving the possible opportunity for the losers 2007+ to veto it for the simple fact of being noobs. :/

 

[Tenko]

The cheaters are trying to get as many yes as possible by using bots to type in their names.

Legit players won't bother They should make it if you typed in the username for yes, it can be for no as well.

 

[Lambda]

I doubt they'll win even if they do... especially since the majority of cheaters used a bot to vote.

 

[cheater2010]

lol should proberly add 500k votes just to make it look real lol there will be like 50k votes for no

 

[xShadowX]

in before skillers and pve heroes vote no...look @ the rs forums there's an equal number against it