Homosexual rights

[MrCo0l]

Paladen, are you Christian?

(And how isn't comething natural?)

 

[ADeadFish]

Heterosexual marriages are valid because they produce children. Infertile couples and old people cannot get legally married because the world needs more children.

Wrong.
The world needs less children. Not more. Give me 10 reasons we need more children and I'll prove those wrong and get another 10 apart from those I proved wrong.

Losing rainforrests? People need houses. Those houses take wood. Get the connection?
Less fish in the sea? Somebody eats them. More people=less fish.
Famine? That means that there is too little food for the amount of people. We have 10 cans of food and 3 people. Each person needs 5 cans to survive. Can they live? No. There is no more food, but shoot that kid and split the cans so everyone is happy and fed.
Want more? Add me on MSN.

Anyways. You still have valid points. I agree near totally. Even though gay couples will just donate to a sperm bank so a woman can still get a baby.
EDIT: Btw, old people can still get married lol check marriage laws.

 

[Dusk412]

Infertile couple get married all the time (legally) and have kids from donations to sperm banks (some from gay couple )

 

[Iminess]

let them do as they wish, if they like somebody of the same sex, like em, if you like some one of opposite thats fine too

 

[boddah1]

Being born; straight is not unnatural or against nature in anyway, being born liking blue color is not against nature, being born with blond hair is not unnautral and neither is being born with brown hair.

But homosexuality is against nature, and we can debate this, for god knows how long and at the bottom line the conclusion will be unnautral.
And what is unnatural is against nature, and what is against nature is either a disease or mutation. Homosexuality denies the basic natural laws such as survival of the specie.

About as natural as you can get are animals, and scientists have found homosexual animals. They have no outside influence on them, making them chose the same gender rather than the opposite. Therefore it is illogical to say homosexuality goes against nature, when things found in nature are sometimes homosexual.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_animals

 

[Krypton6]

About as natural as you can get are animals, and scientists have found homosexual animals. They have no outside influence on them, making them chose the same gender rather than the opposite. Therefore it is illogical to say homosexuality goes against nature, when things found in nature are sometimes homosexual.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_animals

The only way you can attempt to prove homosexuality to be natural through the animal kingdom is by giving examples from animals that do not have sex for the sake of plesaur.

Animals that have sex for fun, such as monkeys showing homosexual behavior, can be compared to as humans homosexuals, since they both have sex for fun. Therefor this is not somethign that you can prove to backup your statement.

Animals that have sex for survivel of the specie, show homosexual/bisexual behavior. But you need to ask yourself why it is that they have sex with their own gender. Its not like they like having sex and prefere their own gender to have it with, cuz that would suddenly make them animals that have sex for the sake of pleasur, of which they do not!

There MUST be a logical explanation for why they show homosexual behavior.
My theory is that they need to get their semen out somehow and are thereby forced to have sex with their own gender! In the animal kingdom females are not in for sex 24/7! They are in for sex a few days, weeks a year and thats it. Now what is this male animal going to do between the females sexualy active periods? The semen production continues, and he needs to get it out one way or another! It cannot masturbate!

And therefor it is forced to have sex with his own gender!

So the animal kingdom cannot be used to backup your statement stating that homosexuality is natural. I already discussed this with schredder, so if you'd like to you can go a few pages back and read.

 

[Tim33]

I think you'r just born with it and you can't help it .
But i do NOT support marriage.

 

[Shredderbeam]

I think you'r just born with it and you can't help it .
But i do NOT support marriage.

You're not born with it. Genetics give a predisposition, but environment and upbringing ultimately determine your sexuality.

Why don't you support marriage?

 

[gorby]

There's millions of Homosexuals living allover the world today. Considering there is such a vast amount of open Homosexuals, surely that cannot be 'unnatural.'

mhm there is also a vast amount of child molesters so this means they cannot be "unnatural?" Because about 40% of every one in highschool does drugs it means its "natural?" um no use common sense

 

[Forgot My Name]

I am a catholic.

God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.

 

[FourFeetOver]

Oh well done.

congraduralton
u is a winrar!!11one
lol

u must b vry perseptif nd intlliligent lulz!1

You've let a book and a culture dictate your life. Ultimate fail?

 

[Reapers Runescape]

I really dont have a problem with homosexuals. The fact that people discriminate against them is just wrong, people do this for all races, there is a very small difference between this and just spreading hatred for a kind people.

 

[DarkSpark]

mhm there is also a vast amount of child molesters so this means they cannot be "unnatural?" Because about 40% of every one in highschool does drugs it means its "natural?" um no use common sense

It depends on the drugs, if they are smoking pot i would deem that to be natural on account of the fact that marijuana is a NATURAL plant.

I am a catholic.

God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.

you remind me why i hated spending six years of my life at catholic school.

I think you'r just born with it and you can't help it .
But i do NOT support marriage.

That isn't wuote true... A large percentage of homosexuals infact have had a marriage and have kids but have been "driven crazy" by their wives/partners and developed some kind of disorder thing that makes them hate women in general and more specifically not find them attractive because they remember what their last relationship was like.

And what is wrong with gay marriage, i mean... Goto a gay website one day and look at how many members there are... times that by about 1000 other websites and you will find that being gay isn't a wierd thing it is now a whole subculture.

 

[Shredderbeam]

I am a catholic.

Thanks for the tip.

God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.

God didn't make anybody. Humans evolved through natural selection. Have any legitimate reasons to ban gay marriage?

 

[MosDef]

God didn't make anybody.

xD

you're a funny guy, belief in evolution is the equivalent to believing in unicorns and fairies.

gay marriage is totally uncool

 

[DarkSpark]

xD

you're a funny guy, belief in evolution is the equivalent to believing in unicorns and fairies.

gay marriage is totally uncool

Actually in my opinion believing in a "god" that created everything is closer to believing in fairies and stuff... I mean seriously. Think about it...

 

[MosDef]

I mean seriously think about it..

do you TRULY believe by some stroke of luck, some "glitch in the matrix", that humans, as complex as we are, were created?

haha, i'm done with this topic, all you clowns will do is give me a headache with your stubbornness and buffoonery

 

[C.Luke]

i voted no its ridicioulas

 

[Ibrahim Al]

I don't think that there is a problem with being a homosexual. God created them like that and they can't do anything about it.

 

[DarkSpark]

I mean seriously think about it..

do you TRULY believe by some stroke of luck, some "glitch in the matrix", that humans, as complex as we are, were created?

haha, i'm done with this topic, all you clowns will do is give me a headache with your stubbornness and buffoonery

So by YOUR logic, god created everything... However i ponder on the feasability of god being able to create everything which would also mean that he would have HAD to create himself as well as the