True, this is a very rough estimate, but accounting for other deaths is a little too difficult. However, there is enough proof over here to show that 0.00045% every year is insignificant.
That might be so, but if the claim regarding the fact that the government created HIV as a method of population control is true, then HIV should be powerful enough to reduce the population of the human race to a desired number in no more than 60-70 years.Surely it's insignificant in the big picture. But if you saw 3 million people in a closed area and saw that that many people were going to die it'd seem a little more significant. HIV doesn't necessarily have to decline the population, but HIV mixed with other causes of death should keep it more stable.
That might be so, but if the claim regarding the fact that the government created HIV as a method of population control is true, then HIV should be powerful enough to reduce the population of the human race to a desired number in no more than 60-70 years.
either they failed miserably at making an effective disease, or your theory is wrong.
Anyways, the big picture is more important than the little one.
http://www.worldometers.info/
scroll down to the bottom and examine the health section. It is more plausible to say cancer is created by the government than HIV, but both are implausible.
I would like to stay ignorant in regards to this matter, and be in my own little world where this is a gene mutation.
I sincerely hope that the USA did not develop it.
In my opinion, Wikipedia is [generally speaking] a reliable source.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_AIDS
Whether the first reported case of HIV was in the 1960s because of poor medical knowledge prior to that era, or being developed by the USA to deal with the population I wouldn't know.
There are some things I'm eager to find out, and some things I'd rather stay in the dark about, this is one of those.
I would like to stay ignorant in regards to this matter, and be in my own little world where this is a gene mutation.
I sincerely hope that the USA did not develop it.
In my opinion, Wikipedia is [generally speaking] a reliable source.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_AIDS
Whether the first reported case of HIV was in the 1960s because of poor medical knowledge prior to that era, or being developed by the USA to deal with the population I wouldn't know.
There are some things I'm eager to find out, and some things I'd rather stay in the dark about, this is one of those.
When you actually look into it and think about it, it's crazy...and creepy![]()
You all seem to be ignoriong the solid evidence I have posted on the previous page lol. The discussion is falling apart.
Edit: I changed my mind, it's not worth discussing here.
However if you want to know about alternative HIV theories watch house of numbers.
Hiv goverment created, 9/11 Goverment created, why everything needs to be created by goverment? That is nonsense.
The hell is a goverment?

