Right, before you say, I know in Finn's sticky it says a staff member can deny on behalf of the staff.
But.. I'm wondering how this is fair? The new high pardon process was developed to overcome one staff members feelings, correct? So how can a staff member deny a pardon when its meant to be a collective decision? Kind of defeats the point In My Opinion.
I'll use this pardon for an example, I do not know him, never spoke to him or whatever, but as you can see, two staff members have said they would be ok with the vote, and a staff member has posted it for him, so in my books that would be three votes, or if not two.
The pardon was only opened today - http://sythe.org/showthread.php?t=985498 - so it hasn't passed the 5/7 days. So the chance of it being taken to voting would of probably been high, so why did Finn deny it when its obviously not the whole view of the staff, including another administrator?
By all means tell me to shut it, but still..
But.. I'm wondering how this is fair? The new high pardon process was developed to overcome one staff members feelings, correct? So how can a staff member deny a pardon when its meant to be a collective decision? Kind of defeats the point In My Opinion.
I'll use this pardon for an example, I do not know him, never spoke to him or whatever, but as you can see, two staff members have said they would be ok with the vote, and a staff member has posted it for him, so in my books that would be three votes, or if not two.
The pardon was only opened today - http://sythe.org/showthread.php?t=985498 - so it hasn't passed the 5/7 days. So the chance of it being taken to voting would of probably been high, so why did Finn deny it when its obviously not the whole view of the staff, including another administrator?
By all means tell me to shut it, but still..






















