• Log in or sign up for an account here: https://www.sythe.org/login

Help us simplify the Sythe Rules

Status
Not open for further replies.
Air Fryer
DIAF
m`lady
Le Kingdoms Player
STEVE
Creamy
Sythe Awards 2016 Winner
Pool Shark
Two Factor Authentication User
Help us simplify the Sythe Rules
In Memory of Jon
Phanpy
Donphan
Rakashrug
Gooby
Detective
Sythe Awards 2015 Winner
Sythe's 10th Anniversary
Valentine's Day 2015
Halloween 2015
Christmas 2015
Easter 2016
Paper Trading Competition Participant
<3 n4n0
Verified Bronze
Sythe Awards 2018 Winner
Pokémon Trainer
Nitro Booster
Verified Ironman
Poképedia
Sythe Awards 2019 Winner
Former OMM
Sythe Awards 2020 Winner
Extreme Homosex
Help us simplify the Sythe Rules
@Sun @Gen @Shin @video - Are you guys still looking for help with this?

We've made a lot of changes since this thread was made, so at this time I would say no we aren't. What has been helpful from users though is taking input through suggestion threads and feedback. That is always welcome
 
Help us simplify the Sythe Rules
Repeated "I support" = SPAM

The repeated portion of the ruling is obscure in design. I don’t see why there would be a reason for anyone to post “I support/do not support” multiple times in a single thread. The repetition portion of the ruling doesn’t state whether it specifically is directed to a single thread or multiple.

The ruling should be simplified by removing the word “repeated”. I don’t believe anyone should be free to post “I support/do not support” without giving a reason. It is spam, repeated or not.

Thank you for looking into this.
 
Air Fryer
DIAF
m`lady
Le Kingdoms Player
STEVE
Creamy
Sythe Awards 2016 Winner
Pool Shark
Two Factor Authentication User
Help us simplify the Sythe Rules
Repeated "I support" = SPAM

The repeated portion of the ruling is obscure in design. I don’t see why there would be a reason for anyone to post “I support/do not support” multiple times in a single thread. The repetition portion of the ruling doesn’t state whether it specifically is directed to a single thread or multiple.

The ruling should be simplified by removing the word “repeated”. I don’t believe anyone should be free to post “I support/do not support” without giving a reason. It is spam, repeated or not.

Thank you for looking into this.
I suggested changing this rule from the original wording several months ago (note I made two suggestions in that thread, but the first 30 or so posts discuss this issue in particular).

Some things to consider:
-No one posts "I support" multiple times in a single thread, but people do post "I support" across multiple threads in rapid succession to farm postcount. This is spam and should be disallowed.
-Staff review suggestions in a group call every month or so. We flip through people's comments when reviewing suggestions and discuss any posts that are particularly important.
-"I support"s are useful for us to get a sense for what the community wants, especially when thinking about a suggestion we personally don't care about very much.
-If we see a whole bunch of "I support"s for something clear and obvious that doesn't really merit an explanation for why you'd support it (e.g. "Remove the X forum because it is inactive"), we want that feedback.

tl;dr - This was changed for good reason and I have no issues with people posting that they support things. We want to encourage feedback in this forum, not discourage it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Runescape Gamblingrunescape gambling
Back
Top