- Joined
- Feb 27, 2007
- Sythe Gold
- 5
- Messages
- 2,192
- Age
- 37
That statement right there was completely queer unless you know nothing about how other countrys live life.
We are SPOILED compared to china life.
China people can't have more than 1 kid per household, if they have more 1 gets put up for adoption. Now tell me, How many children can we have per household? As many as we like.
China doesn't have freedom of speech, the government tells them what they can print in the news and what they can't. We have the right to print anything we like, even if its fake.
Now tell me do we have a ounce of freedom compared to china? I think so.
Well beings I have lived in 7 different countries during my life, I believe I know enough to know what freedom is and isn't.
The reason china is limited to 1 child per family is for good reason, they are overcrowded there are more people in china then there are in the rest of the world together (excluding china of course) and beings that a big chunk of there land cannot be accessed easily it is impossible to have more people coming in with out it being catastrophic.
We my not be encumbered as much as china in the freedom of speech area, but we are a far-cry from being able to print anything we like, go put a add talking about murdering someone in your local news paper, or for example take what Mel Gibson said back a while ago about the Jews, he was forced to apologize and was fined for that. or what Dan rather said about bush he had to apologize and got fired for it. if we truly had freedom of speech these things would not be against the law etc, so don't even attempt to give me that line of garbage.
I believe you should go and read up on a few things before you come in blindly to debate about something you evidently have no idea about.
Right, an in America, you can do that freely. Unless you say youre gonna kill him or overthrow the government. I mean good God the women have to cloak their faces. now THAT'S what I call freedom.....
I respect your decision to not support it, but you act as if theyre so much better than us Americans... Even still we went to get him and overthrow his dictatorship so that WE can sleep at night without worrying, or at leats worrying less. I dont want anyone who even mentions they might have nuclear weapons and not too fond of the USA around at ALL. We dont go around shooting the hell out of civilians. We kill the insurgeants not the kids not the women, not the innocent.
And if i were over there and Saddam was ruling my life and making my life living hell, then yeah I would want someone to come and clean up his act. if the people I knew were stupid enough to support him then its their own fault they would be killed. I would rejoice knowing he was dead.
Thinking of more.....
They do not HAVE to wear them, I stayed in Iraq a short time and they were fairly modern they wore jeans etc. although some did wear vales etc. that covered there face they were not forced to that is just one of there natural fashions in that region.
I am not saying there better than us, I believe no one is better than anyone else in a natural term of thinking, but I am saying we are more on the same level of them it's just that most Americans are too ignorant to realize this.
Oh yes lets trade the maybe few dozen people that would die by him in a year and just do a mass genocide in several years so after the majority of the people are dead who all is left on both sides can sleep better.
He stated he had no nuclear weapons, we did several checks for nuclear weapons, and found nothing. The only reason we went over there is because bush wanted to finish what his daddy tried to do.
So you don't kill innocence you don't kill women and children, well if you say that your full of shit. what about the women and children forced to come out with a rpg, a kamikaze style bomb strapped to them or a AK-47 etc. They are innocent they just have no other choice ,it's either do this have a chance to survive or have a 100% chance of death. and after so much war and after you see what the enemy can\will do how do you know who is innocent or not you don't so you run on instinct and instinct isn't always 100% correct. You can't say something like you don't kill women and children or innocent civilians because you do. It may not be always on purpose but you do. and what about when you go in and level a whole city block using missiles grenades etc. you may be telling everyone to come out, and that it is safe, but what about the people who don't know English and only speak Arabic. etc.
That is just what I am getting at, he wasn't making people's lives a living hell he didn't do anything more than what bush is doing now, even though bush is incompetent does that give us the right to go to the white house and slay him? No, so what gives us the right to go over there and slay Saddam?
Also how would you know how Saddam ruled other than what the government says to the soldiers? did you ever go there for any length of time before the war? did you ever know anyone from there before the war? obviously not or you wouldn't have such misguided views on this subject.
Thanks Shawn And Shin for backing me up. No one REALIZES that uh:
WE HAVE NO CHOICE AS SOLDIERS
KTHX.
You don't have a choice to where you are sent or what you have to do after you have signed up, but you do have the choice to leave the army navy etc. after your term is served and to not go in for another term afterward.



