[DENIED] Rule change.

Also just to add to my previous post as it was late and I completely overlooked this:

Hypothetically if Kaii was sat there with an evil grin on his face bumping his topic when he has full stock, then surely this would do more negative than positive for him?

Aka seller goes to sell him gold, live chat refuse the trade due to full stock, so then the seller never goes to Kaii again.

To claim these bumps are to steal market users from competitors is absurd, this would only make sense for sale topics.

People are spending too much time overthinking the market and putting way too much effort into having 1 up on each other by making stupid reports such as the situation we have here.

For Kaii to have received these locks, the user who planned to sell him gold must have made the report, so that clearly indicates that said user is salty and is unlikely to choose Kaii's site ever again, simply because he would rather spend a few minutes spamming the report button, than waiting a few minutes in chat before the agent can move the gold for him.

Point being, why punish Kaii for this, as reading between the lines the reason he was punished is on assumption he's utilizing spammy market tactics to steal customers from competitors right? Well how can anyone come to that conclusion unless they have never had any level of significance in the market themselves.

We need to go back to having market mods such as R2 and Cas, who were engaged in the market on a large scale, and were much more understanding than some of these mods who sell a couple hundred mill here and there and consider it market experience.

 

This suggestion has been denied.