• Log in or sign up for an account here: https://www.sythe.org/login

Dear Rich

Spam Forum Participant
i bet @Sythe has never eaten a good ass before. Lol fuckin' virgin.
 
Clefairy
Supporting Business
Discord Voice
Jigglypuff
Hell yeah boooi
Poképedia
Who did this to my freakin' car!
Dat Boi
Dolan Duck
Dolan Trump
I'm LAAAAAAAME
Live Free or Die
Mew
Mewtwo
Poké Prizebox
Rust Player
Sythe Awards 2016 Winner
Sythe Awards 2017 Winner
Sythe Awards 2019 Winner
Tier 3 Prizebox
Toast Wallet User
A lack of proof for one side does not function as proof for the other. Evidence for an argument and evidence against an argument are entirely different. You cannot say "these numbers don't prove your point therefore they prove mine," as that is a fallacious train of thought.

Oh dear clearly someone doesn't understand the burden of proof.

Let me put it in the language of statistics: the null hypothesis is that adding women to the economy will have no effect on GDP growth. You add women to the economy. There is insufficient evidence to reject the null in favour of an alternative. The null stands.





Similarly, saying "it fits the facts" does not make it so. You provide an explanation, not a fact. I ask you once again, provide arguments not filled with fallacies.
They are not filled with fallacies. You see fallacies where none exist due to your cognitive bias.

History is not science. Hypotheses are not testable in a lab. However again with vaccines if you look at the graphs of diseases and when the vaccines were introduced you will see there is insufficent evidence to reject the null. This coupled with the fact that vaccines continue to be unable to cure or prevent common infections like cold virus does not present a strong case for the alternative.
 
Oh dear clearly someone doesn't understand the burden of proof.

Let me put it in the language of statistics: the null hypothesis is that adding women to the economy will have no effect on GDP growth. You add women to the economy. There is insufficient evidence to reject the null in favour of an alternative. The null stands.






They are not filled with fallacies. You see fallacies where none exist due to your cognitive bias.

History is not science. Hypotheses are not testable in a lab. However again with vaccines if you look at the graphs of diseases and when the vaccines were introduced you will see there is insufficent evidence to reject the null. This coupled with the fact that vaccines continue to be unable to cure or prevent common infections like cold virus does not present a strong case for the alternative.

Hey instead of schooling people can you give me my village drunk rank thanks
 
Runescape Gamblingrunescape gambling
Back
Top