Dear Rich

@Sonia @Chloe care to represent your gender and attempt a rebuttal?

Implying what I said was an attack on women

Smh Jack you really are a cuck

 

@Sythe

Mr Sythe,

What are you gonna do if God turns out to be real and it's a woman? Hahahaha you're gonna be so fucked!!!

What if God turns out to be real and he's a Muslim

 

Implying what I said was an attack on women

Smh Jack you really are a cuck

Doubtful, just trying to enjoy drama which has been the only draw card the site has had for a while now lmao

 

What if God turns out to be real and he's a Muslim

Then I'd whip out my burka and sandals and say "Allahu Akbar" with a smile

 

women will have better boobs than we ever will

 

[ShipTheFlip]

Let me put it this way: my wife is literally the smartest women I've ever met. Yet there's no way she could build or maintain the servers that run this site, do the coding or development work for it, without being spoon fed every step, even if she had the same degrees I do.

I spent 5 years tutoring programming at UQ. On average women are not as intelligent as men, but it runs a lot deeper than that. Men on average are better at critical problem solving, have a stronger work ethic and innovate much more frequently.

It is not a case of absolute superiority but rather than men and women have different strengths and are therefore not interchangeable.

Look at GDP growth since 1940. 60% of women joined the work force and average GDP growth went down. How is this possible in the Marxist worldview? Today GDP is the same or lower than what it would have been had women not joined the work force. Literally all that has come of second wave feminism is every man's pay cheque is divided in two and half is given to a woman who "works" at his work place. These are facts.

I'd much rather return to a world where men can give half their pay cheque to a woman they care about instead of a random at their work.

And if you doubt this imagine all the men in the world took a week off work. It would completely destroy the structure of production, nothing would work. Water, power, sewer, transport, education, medicine, the Internet, food production, etc. contrast that with if women took a week off work, you'd have trouble booking an appointment and you'd have to make your own coffee.

This is certainly not to say women are worthless, just that their "economic contribution" is frankly a poor use of human potential.

I think I speak for all 3rd wave feminists when I say you are a sexist pig and I have absolutely no statistics or counter-arguments to add to this discussion, we just like to play the victim

 

[Heads447]

Let me put it this way: my wife is literally the smartest women I've ever met. Yet there's no way she could build or maintain the servers that run this site, do the coding or development work for it, without being spoon fed every step, even if she had the same degrees I do.

I spent 5 years tutoring programming at UQ. On average women are not as intelligent as men, but it runs a lot deeper than that. Men on average are better at critical problem solving, have a stronger work ethic and innovate much more frequently.

It is not a case of absolute superiority but rather than men and women have different strengths and are therefore not interchangeable.

Look at GDP growth since 1940. 60% of women joined the work force and average GDP growth went down. How is this possible in the Marxist worldview? Today GDP is the same or lower than what it would have been had women not joined the work force. Literally all that has come of second wave feminism is every man's pay cheque is divided in two and half is given to a woman who "works" at his work place. These are facts.

I'd much rather return to a world where men can give half their pay cheque to a woman they care about instead of a random at their work.

And if you doubt this imagine all the men in the world took a week off work. It would completely destroy the structure of production, nothing would work. Water, power, sewer, transport, education, medicine, the Internet, food production, etc. contrast that with if women took a week off work, you'd have trouble booking an appointment and you'd have to make your own coffee.

This is certainly not to say women are worthless, just that their "economic contribution" is frankly a poor use of human potential.

Literally can't wait until Hillary gets elected on Tuesday to prove you wrong lmao

 

[ShipTheFlip]

Literally can't wait until Hillary gets elected on Tuesday to prove you wrong lmao

Tell me Jefe, how would Hillary possibly prove him wrong? Did you even read the post? Is she going to take the men's jobs in water, power, sewer, transport, education, medicine, etc while simulatenously being president? Lol

 

Some decent rebuttals and conversation. Not a shit thread

 

Some decent rebuttals and conversation. Not a shit thread

You're welcome

 

[b1b]

Let me put it this way: my slave is literally the smartest black I've ever met. Yet there's no way he could build or maintain the servers that run this site, do the coding or development work for it, without being spoon fed every step, even if he had the same degrees I do.

I spent 5 years tutoring programming at UQ. On average blacks are not as intelligent as whites, but it runs a lot deeper than that. Whites on average are better at critical problem solving, have higher IQs, have a stronger work ethic, and innovate much more frequently.

It is not a case of absolute superiority but rather than coloreds and humans have different strengths and are therefore not interchangeable.

I'd much rather return to a world where men can give half their paycheck to a black they care about instead of a random at their work.

And if you doubt this imagine all the non-coloreds in the world took a week off existing. It would completely change the structure of the world. Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against blacks. Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are black, and 10 percent are Hispanic. When whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are black. Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against a white than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery. Blacks are 2.25 times more likely to commit officially-designated hate crimes against whites than vice versa. Contrast that with it if niggers took a week off work, you'd have empty offices missing paper pushers that can't satisfy their wives and have no culture.

This is certainly not to say blacks are worthless, just that their "economic contribution" is frankly a poor use of human potential.

 

The distribution of men in terms of intelligence is wider than that of women so there are more men at both ends of the spectrum while the average intelligence is about the same. I think that is an important distinction and it might be to do cultural and socioeconomic reasons rather than biological reasons but we don't really know and I don't think it really matters except to SJWs.

The means of the curves are different as well as the SD. Male mean is about 10 points above female. However that is rather beside the point, as I've already pointed out. Empirically speaking, the average woman does not innovate the same way the average man does. If she did, there would be tens of thousands of important scientific and technological discoveries by women 50 years after second wave feminism "women's liberation" and 20 years after pro-women bias in education ("affirmative action"). Yet still we see almost nothing. There are still the occasional incredibly bright women who floor everyone with their brilliance, but this is precisely because they are so rare.

A correlation between GDP and women's exposure to the workforce does not prove causation. There are many reasons for the slow down in GDP growth. The US went through a massive boom after WWII because we were larger unharmed by the war and we invested so heavily during the war in our economy that we were FAR FAR FAR ahead of the rest of the world. Growth is also not infinite and it is a lot easier to double our GDP in 1940 than it would be today.

There IS no correlation, that's what I'm saying. The lack of correlation IMPLIES there is no causation. I.e. if women contributed substantially to the economy then GDP growth would go up when they joined the economy. It is a fantastical notion that some other economic force came in to exactly counter balance the number of women joining the work force each year such that GDP growth never increased as a result. Occam's razor my friend.

There are socioeconomic factors driving women entering the workforce but there are also cultural factors. I think there needs to be a shift back to single earner households, especially for families with children, but it doesn't have to be the women who are in the home. There are a lot of systemic issues with the current economy and consumerism of the west but its not as simple as women need to stay in the house.

Women also drive like 70%+ of consumer spending so they are getting more than half your check. Sorry dude.

The lesson of the past two generations is not to throw out tradition blindly. Our culture is made of memes, literally, in the original sense that Dawkins coined it. Memes are units of cultural meaning. They are subject to selection pressures greater and more numerous than we even know. Everything that our culture did hitherto was done FOR A REASON. We ignore our tradition and cultural values at our own peril.

I will give you one example:

Midwifery is a cultural practice involving women helping other women through labour and giving birth. A set of standard practices had been built up around it over thousands of years, which include cleaning very carefully the hands of the midwives before delivering the child.

When western medicine began to make strides in the 1800s physicians began to take over the practice of delivering babies. Except they did not wash their hands. It was not customary to, indeed doctors believed their hands were very clean and they did not know of the germ theory of disease. Well this behaviour lead to an epidemic of "perpetual fever" in new mothers ( Postpartum infections - Wikipedia ) which in turn lead to an epidemic of all sorts of diseases. Essentially the orphans of these women (as high as 1 in 3 children at the time) who were never or were poorly breastfed ended up in poor houses. The lack of breast feeding and parents to earn and look after them in turn lead to poor immune systems, which in turn served as a vector for the spread of diseases.

This lead to the major spikes in all the famous diseases we now consider to have been eliminated by vaccines. When in fact their rise and fall had a lot more to do with physicians at the time not washing their hands.

If doctors had respected tradition none of that needed to happen. Amazingly we still suffer the echos of it today wherein people legitimately believe these diseases were eliminated by vaccines, when they in fact were not.

This same pattern of abandoning cultural memes has occurred everywhere in our culture from our food (people now eat low fat, low salt GMO garbage instead of real food) to our personal relationships (numales, SJWs, broken homes) to our education (lowering the bar, no child left behind) to finance, and everything in between. We've replaced a working set of traditions with a random assortment of ideology and guess work and we are now virtually the sickest, the unhappiest, the poorest (going by debt levels), the least fertile and the least capable of self preservation we've been since the renaissance.

I think people, particularly men, are finally starting to realize this. Everything that was old is new again, and tradition is making a very very strong comeback.

 

This is certainly not to say blacks are worthless, just that their "economic contribution" is frankly a poor use of human potential.

thank you for taking the time to Make Spam Great Again

 

[Felix]

thank you for taking the time to Make Spam Great Again

typical bigoted white male smh

 

typical bigoted white male smh

WHAT WHO CHANGED YOUR NAME

 

[Felix]

WHAT WHO CHANGED YOUR NAME

its been changed ???????

 

its been changed ???????

12221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100

Previously known as FelixCoalBurner

 

[Felix]

12221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100122210012221001222100

Previously known as FelixCoalBurner

 

[Invoker]

My dick is bigger than hers, my ass is fat, id fuck myself if i could. My gf is buff asf, she has a jawline, she is 6 feet tall, and she makes the best cereal

 

The means of the curves are different as well as the SD. Male mean is about 10 points above female. However that is rather beside the point, as I've already pointed out. Empirically speaking, the average woman does not innovate the same way the average man does. If she did, there would be tens of thousands of important scientific and technological discoveries by women 50 years after second wave feminism "women's liberation" and 20 years after pro-women bias in education ("affirmative action"). Yet still we see almost nothing. There are still the occasional incredibly bright women who floor everyone with their brilliance, but this is precisely because they are so rare.



There IS no correlation, that's what I'm saying. The lack of correlation IMPLIES there is no causation. I.e. if women contributed substantially to the economy then GDP growth would go up when they joined the economy. It is a fantastical notion that some other economic force came in to exactly counter balance the number of women joining the work force each year such that GDP growth never increased as a result. Occam's razor my friend.



The lesson of the past two generations is not to throw out tradition blindly. Our culture is made of memes, literally, in the original sense that Dawkins coined it. Memes are units of cultural meaning. They are subject to selection pressures greater and more numerous than we even know. Everything that our culture did hitherto was done FOR A REASON. We ignore our tradition and cultural values at our own peril.

I will give you one example:

Midwifery is a cultural practice involving women helping other women through labour and giving birth. A set of standard practices had been built up around it over thousands of years, which include cleaning very carefully the hands of the midwives before delivering the child.

When western medicine began to make strides in the 1800s physicians began to take over the practice of delivering babies. Except they did not wash their hands. It was not customary to, indeed doctors believed their hands were very clean and they did not know of the germ theory of disease. Well this behaviour lead to an epidemic of "perpetual fever" in new mothers ( Postpartum infections - Wikipedia ) which in turn lead to an epidemic of all sorts of diseases. Essentially the orphans of these women (as high as 1 in 3 children at the time) who were never or were poorly breastfed ended up in poor houses. The lack of breast feeding and parents to earn and look after them in turn lead to poor immune systems, which in turn served as a vector for the spread of diseases.

This lead to the major spikes in all the famous diseases we now consider to have been eliminated by vaccines. When in fact their rise and fall had a lot more to do with physicians at the time not washing their hands.

If doctors had respected tradition none of that needed to happen. Amazingly we still suffer the echos of it today wherein people legitimately believe these diseases were eliminated by vaccines, when they in fact were not.

This same pattern of abandoning cultural memes has occurred everywhere in our culture from our food (people now eat low fat, low salt GMO garbage instead of real food) to our personal relationships (numales, SJWs, broken homes) to our education (lowering the bar, no child left behind) to finance, and everything in between. We've replaced a working set of traditions with a random assortment of ideology and guess work and we are now virtually the sickest, the unhappiest, the poorest (going by debt levels), the least fertile and the least capable of self preservation we've been since the renaissance.

I think people, particularly men, are finally starting to realize this. Everything that was old is new again, and tradition is making a very very strong comeback.

>mfw the tl;dr of this is "always remember memes"
>mfw that in itself is a meme
>mfw