Anything goes now on sigs?

[BrianTirae]

Everyone has their homosexual naked sweaty make out .gif's

I guess straight .gif's with making out and shirtless go as well?

 

[Boosting Hell]

I'm not too keen on them. I don't have anything against homosexuals, nor am I homophobic, but it's not always what I want to see when i'm scrolling down a forum and see 2 males making out.

 

Well I don't care about peoples sexual orientation but what the hell will your parents think or friends if you're casually scrolling and you see like 3 of those signatures in a row. It's NSFW in my opinion. Since there isn't a rule on it I'm not going to go around and remove them but frankly something like that should be removed because personally I know now I need to turn off signatures whilst browsing in public.

 

[BrianTirae]

Well I don't care about peoples sexual orientation but what the hell will your parents think or friends if you're casually scrolling and you see like 3 of those signatures in a row. It's NSFW in my opinion. Since there isn't a rule on it I'm not going to go around and remove them but frankly something like that should be removed because personally I know now I need to turn off signatures whilst browsing in public.

OMG I could not have said it better myself... I don't even read what they post because I don't wanna see that crap.

Edit: I'm going to make a suggestion to keep signatures clean and use your quote if you don't mind.

Edit:

I'm going to rule on this because I'm sick of looking at them and it will hurt traffic when people come and see a bunch of gay dudes pashing in every second signature.

Signatures must not contain pashing or make-out gifs.
Signatures must be safe for school / work. The staff are entitled to decide what constitutes safe for school / work.
Guidelines for the clothing of people in photos used in signatures:
1. Female should be wearing at minimum a standard bikini.
2. Guy should be wearing at minimum board shorts.
3. If the signature contains more flesh than you would see at an average public beach it is in violation of these guidelines.

There is a rule man take them down please

 

[Zeus22]

No one is going to be touching my signature. idgaf if it offends you because you're insure/secretly homosexual and just won't admit it or a Westbro Baptist Church bigot either.

 

[Lean]

No one is going to be touching my signature. idgaf if it offends you because you're insure/secretly homosexual and just won't admit it or a Westbro Baptist Church bigot either.

I hate to inform you, but if your signature violates the rules it WILL be TOUCHED.

 

[Sephiroth]

Sythe ruled on this in a suggestion thread. Zeus you are just trying to defy the rules now, as you were a part of the suggestion thread where sythe said you could NOT have those kinds of GIF's in your siggy.

 

[Zeus22]

Sythe ruled on this in a suggestion thread. Zeus you are just trying to defy the rules now, as you were a part of the suggestion thread where sythe said you could NOT have those kinds of GIF's in your siggy.

Re-read what he ruled.

My gif does not contain:
-pashing
-making-out/kissing
-nudity

It's simply a gif of two men near a waterfall trying to tie another man's shoe up. I'd like to see someone try and remove it.

 

[Robert Nesta]

My gif does not contain:
-pashing
-making-out/kissing
-nudity

I'd like to see someone try and remove it.

Listen here you faggot, stop posting your gay ass shit that nobody wants to see.

I'm kidding, that's just gross.

 

[physionite]

No one is going to be touching my signature. idgaf if it offends you because you're insure/secretly homosexual and just won't admit it or a Westbro Baptist Church bigot either.

I don't give a fuck if your straight, gay, lesbian, trans or other. But what am I going to do if someone walks up behind me at school or if one of my parents come behind me and on the screen as I'm scrolling down is a group of sweaty bastards "standing near a waterfall tying a shoe" because you know and I know that's bullshit.

If you wanted to promote homosexuality have a fucking rainbow as your signature and promote it the right way not with pornography....


/endrant

 

[Zeus22]

I don't give a fuck if your straight, gay, lesbian, trans or other.

*you're

But what am I going to do if someone walks up behind me at school or if one of my parents come behind me and on the screen as I'm scrolling down is a group of sweaty bastards "standing near a waterfall tying a shoe" because you know and I know that's bullshit.

You have several options as a matter of fact. First (and I highly recommend this option), you can adblock my image(s). Second, you can tell your parents or whoever the truth. Lastly, you can refrain from logging onto Sythe while you're in school, work, etc. In any case, it's not my problem. Take it up with Richard and ask him to amend the ruling if you really want.

If you wanted to promote homosexuality have a fucking rainbow as your signature and promote it the right way not with pornography....

I hate faggots.

 

[Sephiroth]

Well, Zeus, you may be right that the GIF you have now doesn't "violate" his wording of the rule, You went out of your way to skirt what he actually meant. You and I both know the innuendo this GIF implicates, and it doesn't take a scientist or even an 8th grade kid to understand that.

The GIF is implying that the two men get on their knees and kiss/fondle/lick that man's phallus, and then, MAYBE tie his shoes. lol

 

Undermining rules should receive a punishment of some sort. It should be at staff's discretion to determine whether the person is deliberately trying to undermine a rule.

 

[Zeus22]

Well, Zeus, you may be right that the GIF you have now doesn't "violate" his wording of the rule, You went out of your way to skirt what he actually meant. You and I both know the innuendo this GIF implicates, and it doesn't take a scientist or even an 8th grade kid to understand that.

The GIF is implying that the two men get on their knees and kiss/fondle/lick that man's phallus, and then, MAYBE tie his shoes. lol

If you saw the 1968, movie Planet of the Apes (rated G btw), then you would know that I'm actually telling the truth.

Undermining rules should receive a punishment of some sort. It should be at staff's discretion to determine whether the person is deliberately trying to undermine a rule.

You also need to go back and re-read the ruling. It was stated that staff do have the authority to determine whether one's signature is appropriate or not.

 

I didn't say for signatures only.

 

[Zeus22]

I didn't say for signatures only.

But you implied it.

 

"A rule" is not specific.

If I was going to speak of this rule, I would've made it known.

 

[Zeus22]

"A rule" is not specific.

If I was going to speak of this rule, I would've made it known.

You didn't need to. Due to the context of this thread, it was obvious you were referring to it.

 

You would be naive to assume my position based on where I post, given that I wasn't targeting a specific rule. Even so you actually are trying to undermine the specifics of what is acceptable by Sythe. It gave me the idea of suggesting the idea for all rules incase of future events similar to this one.

I'm unable to view any signatures, but after viewing the signature on your profile, it's definitely not safe for a work or school enviornment.

 

[Zeus22]

You would be naive to assume my position based on where I post, given that I wasn't targeting a specific rule.

Explain.

Even so you actually are trying to undermine the specifics of what is acceptable by Sythe.

Even if I was, what's your point?

It gave me the idea of suggesting the idea for all rules incase of future events similar to this one.

I'd love to hear the specifics of this idea.

I'm unable to view any signatures, but after viewing the signature on your profile, it's definitely not safe for a work or school enviornment.

Not for you to decide.