Ban RSF Sigs!

[BGD]

You shouldn't allow sigs that advertise or have anything to do with RSF Wow blows had a sig advertising his site on their and it was taken off and apparently they have no problem putting their sigs on other forums so they should not be allowed on here! That is complete bullshit and therefore their sigs should be taken off!



Oh and I was banned on there for bringing up the fact that they allow scammers on RSF

 

[Deacon Frost]

I second that, and they also won't ban Andrew, when I supplied sufficient Sythe proof, they said it was not worthy of a banning.


They mock you, worse than Zamorak did..

I second you BGD, ban them and their affiliates who assist them.


Not willing to cooperate eh?

 

[Clashfan]

Uh what? You're allowed to advertise a site in your sig. We can't control what or who they allow on their site.

 

[BGD]

Lol lots of people already do that -.- and Im only saying RSF sigs should be banned. I mean seriously they talk shit about sythe and everything to do with sythe yet they are allowed here?


What shocked me even more is there advertisement is allowed on the bottom ?????

 

[Deacon Frost]

Uh what? You're allowed to advertise a site in your sig. We can't control what or who they allow on their site.

Yes, everyone is fully aware of that... however, they bleep 'sythe' out on their site, they don't take caution to scammers, and ensure that they are by no means affiliated.. Thus, they should not be allowed to roam..

sorry, I've kidnapped your thread, but I was about to post this..


The sigs should be banned, if they aren't.. but as I remember, most of Zamorak's people were banned because of this kind of stupidity..

Why not the same? They filter sythe, and then when I showed them proof from sythe.org that Andrew had been banned, why he had been banned, and links to where it happened.. they simply told me to take the necessary steps to filing a scammer report, and deleted the post.... then infracted, and banned me forever.

 

[BGD]

There advertisement should be taken off and like Deacon said their affiliates should be banned! Apparently we are fail.org to them yet they still come here and advertise.

 

[Clashfan]

Look, it's their site. They can allow whoever they want on it. They can ban whoever they want. When fagex had a huge passcracking section we didn't ban fagex sigs.

 

[Deacon Frost]

Ok, sure.. it's their site, and they control who's on it.. but if they are continuing to bash Sythe.org, and repeatedly say that the evidence supplied is simply poppycock.. then they are no better than Zamorak.

They control their site, you control this one... So keep these scammer affiliates off of it?

 

[Brandeis]

LAWL. Clash, I had the sig I have below advertising, and they removed it and wrote "Don't advertise garbage in your sig", and called sythe.org scum close to 1 million times. I got my thread locked for disputing it and then infracted. The "Head Mod" over there told me if I talk about Andrew not being banned again, im IP banned. They bleep out sythe.org like it's a curse. Im sorry, but anyone affiliated with them should be shot, thrown in a ditch, shit on by TDD, and then buried. Im sorry but sythe.org needs to take some action. They have 1,000 members and think they are better than us at 60,000+.

 

[R2Pleasent]

LAWL. Clash, I had the sig I have below advertising, and they removed it and wrote "Don't advertise garbage in your sig", and called sythe.org scum close to 1 million times. I got my thread locked for disputing it and then infracted. The "Head Mod" over there told me if I talk about Andrew not being banned again, im IP banned. They bleep out sythe.org like it's a curse. Im sorry, but anyone affiliated with them should be shot, thrown in a ditch, shit on by TDD, and then buried. Im sorry but sythe.org needs to take some action. They have 1,000 members and think they are better than us at 60,000+.

Hey, the fact is, rsforums is small potatoes. They can talk all the shit they want, most of their members are also members on Sythe, or they've been banned at Sythe. I say, why even waste the energy prohibiting them. They really cause no harm.

 

[SlaveOfTheBeast]

I agree. We shouldn't advertise their site when it bashes sythe so bad.

 

[Deacon Frost]

Hey, the fact is, rsforums is small potatoes. They can talk all the shit they want, most of their members are also members on Sythe, or they've been banned at Sythe. I say, why even waste the energy prohibiting them. They really cause no harm.

By denying Sythe as a legit trading site, or proofable site, then they clearly have no intent of banning scammers we have banned for a reason. That's kind of shitty. Allowing such to go on, is not worth it, and the harm they have caused is like hoarding a criminal.

Allowing such to go to their site without reprecaution is codswallop.


E: AS to the issue regarding their link at the bottom of the site:

Sythe has said they pay for it, then let them keep that... but the actions they take are heinous, and do not merit remain. If they wish to stay, ask them to pay . [/sarcasm]... but no seriously, even such.. it's dirty money made from dirty scammers.

 

[Deacon Frost]

People are free to post what they want in their signatures as long as it's not (overly) obsene. Freedom of speech. But as someone (I don't remember who) mentioned earlier, Sythe isn't a democracy.

It's kind of like people stealing American IDs in Togo. We (the American law enforcement) can't charge them legally for it because they're not affiliated with us. We can't control what they do, albeit the fact that we want to....

lol... everyone says that.. I've personally had my signature destroyed by Yakov for having a picture of a bunch of words against a global and for a banned person...

That seems like if they'd remove that, then remove RSForums sigs

 

[SlaveOfTheBeast]

lol... everyone says that.. I've personally had my signature destroyed by Yakov for having a picture of a bunch of words against a global and for a banned person...

That seems like if they'd remove that, then remove RSForums sigs

Indeed.

 

[Firerange]

You guys want to know why you were banned? We at RSF have decided to give Andrew a second chance, so unless he scams at RSF, we won't ban him. You two were banned because you kept repeatedly flaming other members, including Richard, you spammed our forums instead of just shutting up and letting it die, and you were saying Andrew should be banned without any proof from OUR site, which if you provide us with some, we will gladly ban him for you.Another thing, we DO have a policy against scammers, go into the market and read the stickies dumbass. A MM must be used, proof must be given for scam reports that aren't chat logs, etc.

 

[BGD]

You guys want to know why you were banned? We at RSF have decided to give Andrew a second chance, so unless he scams at RSF, we won't ban him. You two were banned because you kept repeatedly flaming other members, including Richard, you spammed our forums instead of just shutting up and letting it die, and you were saying Andrew should be banned without any proof from OUR site, which if you provide us with some, we will gladly ban him for you.Another thing, we DO have a policy against scammers, go into the market and read the stickies dumbass. A MM must be used, proof must be given for scam reports that aren't chat logs, etc.

Haha I was doing neither spamming nor flaming it was one two topics which were deleted because I was asking a complete legit question which neither of you seem to answer. An it was Nathan that stated you did not need a policy for scammers therefor you don't have one. You let people with scamming history on your site so its a safehaven for scammers. No one answered my question directly.

 

[kmalik]

Scammers are scammers and should be banned if they are on another site. BTW Firerange stop being an ass.

 

[Deacon Frost]

You guys want to know why you were banned? We at RSF have decided to give Andrew a second chance, so unless he scams at RSF, we won't ban him. You two were banned because you kept repeatedly flaming other members, including Richard, you spammed our forums instead of just shutting up and letting it die, and you were saying Andrew should be banned without any proof from OUR site, which if you provide us with some, we will gladly ban him for you.Another thing, we DO have a policy against scammers, go into the market and read the stickies dumbass. A MM must be used, proof must be given for scam reports that aren't chat logs, etc.

I don't recall flaming? I believe I used proper grammar, and never intended to insult anyone, just the ones who were TRYING to run the site.

And I provided you proof from another site, then got told 3 different things from 3 different people.. really unorganized.. and you don't Sythe's proof seriously, and don't allow it to go through... you even bad mouth Sythe and repeatedly say you are not affiliated.. I see a link at the bottom of the screen, and many of your members are registered...?...


That spells affiliation. Learn to run a site, because you are doing a poor job.

 

[snaxe]

Even if it were banned I don't think anyone could control it anyways.

 

[Firerange]

Whatever, do what you want. I'll probably be banned in a few hours anyways, just for posting this.