Ok, blade bro4 suggested "new post count ranks" or something indecisive a long those lines, not sure what came of it, but here goes...
There are a lot of people getting more than 2,000 posts these days, and IMO a higher rank would be appropriate; 'Legend' at 4,000 posts. Why 4,000? Well it's double Grand Master (which is double Guru, follows the pattern...(?)) which seems fair.
The original post count ranks were designed (in 2005 I assume) when there weren't as many members thus not as much posting going on, so I reckon it's time for a new rank to accommodate the posting habits of users of 2011... A new post count rank beyond 2,000 is also added incentive for users to continue posting too, I guess...
Thoughts?
There are a lot of people getting more than 2,000 posts these days, and IMO a higher rank would be appropriate; 'Legend' at 4,000 posts. Why 4,000? Well it's double Grand Master (which is double Guru, follows the pattern...(?)) which seems fair.
The original post count ranks were designed (in 2005 I assume) when there weren't as many members thus not as much posting going on, so I reckon it's time for a new rank to accommodate the posting habits of users of 2011... A new post count rank beyond 2,000 is also added incentive for users to continue posting too, I guess...
Thoughts?























































