WHOEVER DENIED THIS IS AN ASSHOLE. IT WASN'T EVEN CONSIDERED FOR A FULL DAY. PUT IT FUCKING BACK YOU COMMUNIST BASTARDS.
This may seem like a bogus suggestion, but hear me out. It could actually prove to be quite beneficial to both Sythe.org and its members.
Often we have suffered at the hands of an idiot, a troller, a faggot, etc. We the people endure them until they fuck up and are banned/leave. This grows tiring, and often the community is left divided, breaking rules as they insult the people not liked, they attack, etc.
It's no doubt that we do not like people who push our limits.
I'm not saying just those in our SPAM forum, I'm saying all over the forums, these kinds of people roam. They don't care for other people, they don't care about the forums, and they're basically just assholes here to waste our time (more so).
So lets have ban referrals
!
I figure, if 5 different people provide like 10 reasons why a particular member should be banned, a vote should be started in the staff lounge for the staff to vote on a banning. Ranging anywhere from 2 weeks to permanent.
The forum for this would be private, you could only see posts you make, and replies by staff members, everything else wouldn't appear. That way no one knows you suggested them for banning, and no one gets upset/hacks someone etc.
Of course this system can be abused, but I think referral banning for staff members to make the decision would be a great way to clean up some of the filthy people who plague our threads.
They aren't technically breaking the rules, but if they don't wanna contribute properly, or they constantly annoy and piss off members, no reason why they should remain in the community.
For instance, back during my conspiracy days, if you had had something like this, you could have banned me without cause as it was a majority vote, sort of like a form of democracy.... that works.
There would have to be at least more than one person reporting another person, so it doesn't become a scammer report fest, and it can't be for any reasons like breaking the rules and such. After the information is compiled, it's put in the SL for discussion/voting. Majority vote wins, user then is sentenced to whatever term deemed necessary by an admin.
I'd say the number of votes would persuade harsher/lighter sentences. For instance, if it's a ban by +1 majority, then make it a 2 week ban, if it's unanimous, then permanent... etc.
It's kinky, but sexy.
This may seem like a bogus suggestion, but hear me out. It could actually prove to be quite beneficial to both Sythe.org and its members.
Often we have suffered at the hands of an idiot, a troller, a faggot, etc. We the people endure them until they fuck up and are banned/leave. This grows tiring, and often the community is left divided, breaking rules as they insult the people not liked, they attack, etc.
It's no doubt that we do not like people who push our limits.
I'm not saying just those in our SPAM forum, I'm saying all over the forums, these kinds of people roam. They don't care for other people, they don't care about the forums, and they're basically just assholes here to waste our time (more so).
So lets have ban referrals
!I figure, if 5 different people provide like 10 reasons why a particular member should be banned, a vote should be started in the staff lounge for the staff to vote on a banning. Ranging anywhere from 2 weeks to permanent.
The forum for this would be private, you could only see posts you make, and replies by staff members, everything else wouldn't appear. That way no one knows you suggested them for banning, and no one gets upset/hacks someone etc.
Of course this system can be abused, but I think referral banning for staff members to make the decision would be a great way to clean up some of the filthy people who plague our threads.
They aren't technically breaking the rules, but if they don't wanna contribute properly, or they constantly annoy and piss off members, no reason why they should remain in the community.
For instance, back during my conspiracy days, if you had had something like this, you could have banned me without cause as it was a majority vote, sort of like a form of democracy.... that works.
There would have to be at least more than one person reporting another person, so it doesn't become a scammer report fest, and it can't be for any reasons like breaking the rules and such. After the information is compiled, it's put in the SL for discussion/voting. Majority vote wins, user then is sentenced to whatever term deemed necessary by an admin.
I'd say the number of votes would persuade harsher/lighter sentences. For instance, if it's a ban by +1 majority, then make it a 2 week ban, if it's unanimous, then permanent... etc.
It's kinky, but sexy.
.
