• Log in or sign up for an account here: https://www.sythe.org/login

9/11 Conspiracy or Terroism?

I really think it was a conspiracy too as you can make the twin towers in fire with the 20 dollar bill.
 
St. Patrick's Day 2013
I believe 9/11 was a test to see how the American public would react in the case of an attack on the US and/or a large natural disaster.
 
I m pretty sure it was conspiracy and had nothing to do with terrorism. I have heard people say that it was ordered by big oil firm(s) so US would invade Iraq. War is a huuuuuge money hole for many company's. I think it was made for money and terrorists had nothing to do with it. My opinion is greatly biased by the movie Zeitgeist.
 
one tower gets hit with plane. falls perfectly upon itself. completely unlikely

second tower gets hit with plane and falls perfectly upon itself. even more unlikely.

a building that was not even hit with a plane falls perfectly upon itself. uuuuuummm why are we still debating this.


i agree.
 
I m pretty sure it was conspiracy and had nothing to do with terrorism. I have heard people say that it was ordered by big oil firm(s) so US would invade Iraq. War is a huuuuuge money hole for many company's. I think it was made for money and terrorists had nothing to do with it. My opinion is greatly biased by the movie Zeitgeist.

I agree completely. Zeitgeist is recommended must watch video for many Americans which provides many details and explanations that highlight the fallacies in the official report that was conducted.
 
Two Factor Authentication User
simpsons911.jpg
[/URL]

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

What exactly is that picture supposed to prove..?
 
‎"USA lost many lives on 9-11-01 and now Japan has lost more lives on 3-10-11. add the 2 dates together and you get 12-21-12....................oh shit....;(
 
Its 100% a Conspiracy Jet Fuel Cannot Melt Those Steel Beams Holding up the World Trade Center. If you ever watched a demolition building video. Its almost identical how the Building Implodes into its self.

And who says its not possible?

Yeah your right about just Jet fuel is not hot enough to melt the steel, but the strength of the steel weakens after prolonged exposure to the fire. The steel looses its stiffness and becomes weak. The loss of strength resulting from the fire caused the building to fail. Once one storey fell all the floors above would have begun to fall and gain momentum crushing the floors beneath it.


/thread
 
I don't want to get all Chemistry on you but the melting point of steel is far from what Jet Fuel Can produce. By Standers who were next to the building at the time herd little explosions. Can it be? The building was rigged to blow, Exactly

Like I said "but the strength of the steel weakens after prolonged exposure to the fire"

It doesn't need to melt Just become weak.
 
Like I said "but the strength of the steel weakens after prolonged exposure to the fire"

It doesn't need to melt Just become weak.

so you are arguing that all the support beams int he building simultaneously "weakened" to the point where the building FULLY collapsed UPON ITSELF?

also, for your theory to work, the buildings falling momentum would have to have been equal throughout the levels of the building. meaning that if one half of the floor collapsed faster than the other half, the building would have toppled over and debris would have rained down onto other buildings. it is extremely unlikely that the building would have fallen as it did under your circumstances.

geee. i think that would be a far stretch even for someone who believes in a magical deity.
 
so you are arguing that all the support beams int he building simultaneously "weakened" to the point where the building FULLY collapsed UPON ITSELF?

geee. i think that would be a far stretch even for someone who believes in a magical deity.

Like I said "Once one storey fell all the floors above would have begun to fall and gain momentum crushing the floors beneath it. "
 
Runescape Gamblingrunescape gambling
Back
Top